This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.
It seems you have an interest in plant profiles; I like such works. But you need to improve your photographic and analytic skills; so trying COM:QIC prior to COM:FPC may better. Just a friendly suggestion. Cheers. JKadavoorJee02:30, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Por favor, não faça alterações grosseiras em imagens como as que fez aqui File:Rio night.jpg ou serei obrigado a comunicar os administradores do Commons. Espero que compreenda e agradeço desde já. Chronus (talk) 05:03, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Please leave other people's images alone. I realise you are trying to improve but you are making very clumsy edits: very high noise reduction, over saturated, over sharpening. These are not improvements. If you think a photo can be improved, talk to the uploader/photographer first to see if they wish to try for improvements. It is much easier to improve an image with access to the RAW file and a modern RAW converter than to fiddle with the JPG. If you don't stop this, I shall ask an admin to stop you. Concentrate on your own photos please. -- Colin (talk) 16:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Fernanda Lima. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Please stop quick withdrawals; it is insulting to the potential contributors (who make those works) and an unnecessary overload to us. This is my second friendly reminder. (You can reply here as this page is in my watch list.) Jee16:10, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: St Olaf's Church, Tallinn. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: English Embankment, Saint Petersburg, Russia. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
I see what happened now. I intended to set bridge image for that especial date so, if you don't mind, I put galaxy image there then revert your edit. Regards. --Monfie (talk) 17:50, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
My photos of Saint-Georges-de-Didonne
Hi ArionEstar. Thank you very much, I am pleased you enjoyed my photos of Saint-Georges-de-Didonne . But I'm really sorry I can not undertake the editing required, unfortunately I do not know how to do, I'm confused. Well, maybe a contributor will do it for me. Thank you for your encouragement. Best wishes and good weekend. Cordially.--Jlvenet (talk) 20:30, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Photo editing (again)
Please stop editing other people's photographs and uploading your version on top. The version of File:Stralsund Marienkirche 2006.jpg you uploaded was less than half the size of the original. You are clearly saving the JPG at a low quality setting and the JPG artefacts are quite visible. You have been warned by me and other another user already. Please stop or I will ask an admin to stop you. Touching up JPGs requires a lot of skill and avoided unless necessary. It is nearly always best to first ask the creator of the image to fix any problems. -- Colin (talk) 21:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Have a read about the quality setting on your Photoshop. You should set it higher. But every time one edits a JPG the quality deteriorates slightly so it is best avoided if at all possible. Btw, you can use Photoshop to see the difference between the two versions of your file. Open the original and then your version. Copy your version as a new layer on top of the original. Change the blending mode for the layer to "difference" and zoom to 100%. You will see lots of tiny differences. Also have a look at your version at 200% compared to the original at 200%. Neither are perfect but your version has more digital noise due to the JPG compression. So that's a lot of deterioration for the sake of a couple of dust spots that I'm sure few will notice. -- Colin (talk) 22:23, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Para agradecer y comentarle
Hola, ArionEstar partiendo de los comentarios y sugerencias que emitieron algunos usuarios sobre sobre mi archivo: Sistema de regadío circular; , el cual usted sí emitió su voto a favor, algo que le agradezco mucho, y por la importancia e interés que considero pueda tener esta maquinaria para la agricultura, (además de su impacto visual por su forma y tamaño), donde pudiera ayudar apoyando algún proyecto de la comunidad, he decidido subir una nueva foto del mismo, pero donde puede verse el equipo en toda su magnitud con otra perspectiva, , e igualmente la he nominado a candidata a FP. Le hago saber esto pues agradecería y apreciaría muchísimo si usted pudiera pasar y dar su nueva valoración y opinión sobre esta foto actual. Muchas gracias nuevamente. Un saludo cordial Ivan2010
Agradeciendole
Muchas gracias por su voto a favor y su comentario sobre mi archivo. Sistema de regadío circular en toda su magnitud. , Un saludo cordial. Ivan2010
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
★Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Independência ou Morte(Independence or Death). If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results:
We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks, the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Oi Arion. Agora solamente tiraré fotos não São Paulo, em decembro eu acredito no Recife tambem. Seria muito util si voce pudiera fazer uma lista de monumentos para ser fotografiados na ciudade São Paulo, alem disso para ser usado em WLM. --The Photographer (talk) 18:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Cada fin de semana estare tomando fotos, cuando você acredite que desee ir, pode acompanharme, o unico requisito e não conhecer nada de fotografia, um abrazo --The Photographer (talk) 22:16, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
@Wilfredo: Olá Wlfredor, boa noite. ;) Eu posso dizer que na minha estadia no Wikimedia Commons eu aprendi muita coisa sobre fotografia como foco, exposição, perspectiva, saturação... ArionEstar (talk) 22:29, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
Done !
Hi, Arionestar ! I think I've straightened the lamp posts without modifying the building. I'd like to send it to you, so as tou can see the difference between the two files but I don't know your internet address... I can, of course, upload the file myself... Tell me what to do, please. -- Best regards. --JLPC (talk) 16:38, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
@JLPC: The image needs only a perspective correction, because the lamp on the right side is tilted. If you can fix, you're welcome to upload a new version of the image. ArionEstar (talk) 17:17, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Since you edited and directed the comment to me, and I don't know if there is the correct place for me to learn and discuss that, I will ask you here, .png applications are prohibited or something? Sorry, I'm really rookie at this, I can withdraw if that was a bad act. :P --Nakinn ✉04:19, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
I can't see nothing in the rules prohibiting, or even in Commons. But ok, I have to/can withdraw? or I have to leave it there for archiving? --Nakinn ✉18:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Oi Arion, tudo bom?. Recomendo ler Commons:User-specific galleries, templates and categories policy, exactamente onde fala de (i.e., if you add "Category:Photos of London by User:Example" you still need to add "Category:London" to the same image). Que quer decir isto? que si você tenhe uma categoria "Category:Featured pictures of Brazil by User:Example" você deve anexar para cada imagem também "Category:Featured pictures of Brazil" --The Photographer (talk) 18:46, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Estoy escribiendo en español para mayor comodidad y rapidez :p. Estaba pensando en que me propusieras una lista de cosas para fotografiar por são paulo que ainda não haya fotografiado o que sus versiones en wikipedia en portugues no sean muy buenas --The Photographer (talk) 16:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi ArionEstar, I am not sure what you mean by expanded version. The current version is 4,288 × 2,850 which is the largest available. I do not know if there is a bigger version. Regards Originalwana (talk) 14:12, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
WLM 2015
Por pouco eu nao organizei o WLM no Brasil em 2014. Levei tanta pedrada por organizar o WLE que acabei deixando isso de lado. Mesmo os considerados ativos e "lideres" da Wikimedia Brasil foram contra e eu tive que comprar a briga sozinho. Cheguei a pesquisar editais e já tinha conseguido um apoio 100% garantido de algo em torno de R$60.000,00 para investir no WLE e WLM em 2015, mas acabei dispensando e nao me esforcei pra conseguir isso pois o prazo era curto e o apoio era zero. O WLE gerou resultados surpreendentes, a foto vencedora do Brasil ficou em segundo lugar na etapa internacional. Com certeza o o WLM tem ainda mais potencial, não sei se vou contribuir em algo aqui em 2015, a comunidade é muito hostil, principalmente com quem chega com muita energia querendo fazer as coisas acontecerem, como foi no meu caso. De qualquer forma, qualquer novidade me chame por aqui. Abraços Rodrigo Padula (talk) 13:36, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
ArionEstar, when will you learn to stop editing photos like you do. There are ways of cropping that do not result in the file size halving when you shave a few pixels off the top. The best solution, if a crop is required, is to ask The Photographer to upload a new version cropped from his source files. If they are no longer available, then there are lossless cropping tools and also a page you can request crops on Commons (I forget where). Please leave the images alone. -- Colin (talk) 22:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Oi ArionEstar O ideal, nesses casos, é para pedir ajuda o autor a fazer isso e, geralmente, é subida como uma obra derivada. Este fim de semana, eu tento fazer o upload do arquivo RAW para que você possa fazer o corte como um derivado da versão melhor qualidade. --The Photographer (talk) 11:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Dê um zoom: [2] entre a imagem espelhada e a fruta mesmo e você entenderá a razão pela qual não dá para deixar aquela imagem. ;) -- RTA21:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
PS: Pode estar melhor, mas a segunda está exatamente como a goiaba que eu tirei. :)
Hello :) I know that Brasil is a beautiful country (very nice photos!). Unfortunately, today is too far for me, but maybe int he future... :) Best regards --Pudelek (talk) 14:04, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Agradeciendo la re-nominación de mi imagen. De Ivan2010
Hola -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk), disculpa le escriba en español, que es mi lengua natal, pero se me hace bastante difícil poder escribir en ingles expresando correctamente lo que quiero decir, ojalá pueda usted leer mis letras. Le agradezco su re-nominación del mi: File:Calle en Trinidad que da acceso al Casco Historico.JPG/2, ni siquiera tenía conocimientos de que una imagen podía ser nominada más de una vez. En la primera nominación culminó con 10 votos a favor y 6 en contra, con opiniones y criterios muy fuertes, habrá que ver y esperar esta nueva nominación que piensa la comunidad, aunque yo pudiera subir una nueva versión de la misma mejorada si usted lo considera, si cree que esto puede ayudar, solo hágamelo saber. De todas formas le repito mi agradecimiento por la re-nominación, y por haberme enseñado algo que no sabía; la posibilidad de nominar más de una vez. Le deseo las mejores cosas del mundo para usted. Un saludo afectuoso desde aquí; Ivan2010
Hola -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) partiendo de la re-nominación que usted hizo de la imagen mía, (y a pesar de que la misma tuvo que ser eliminada como candidata), como te dije en mis anteriores palabras de aquel momento, aprendí nuevas cosas posibles de hacer que no sabía, algo que seguiré agradeciéndote, y decidí entonces mejorar otra imagen mía que nominé hace 1 año, para subirla actualizada como candidata igualmente a FP. Apreciaría mucho si pudieses pasarte por allí y emitir tu opinión sobre ella, quizás haya más suerte. Una vez más gracias por todo y un saludo afectuoso para ti desde aquí. -- Ivan2010 (talk) 13:42, 14 February 2015
Movida de Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Jardim Botânico Fanchette Rischbieter em Curitiba 02.jpg
@Rodrigo.Argenton: Não. Eu nomeei a imagem porque eu gosto dela. Não disse em nenhum momento que eu nomeei a imagem por causa do país de onde ela foi tirada. Eu a nomeei porque eu penso que ela poderia ser FP. Ela é QI, mas isso não quer dizer que ela possa ou não ser FP. Ela, para mim, tem boa qualidade. As pessoas e a composição não me incomodam. Só porque eu nomeei uma foto brasileira que teve votos contra não quer dizer que eu a nomeei por causa do país. Não complique as coisas. E quem vê assim parece que eu nunca nomeei nenhuma foto que se tornou FP. Veja algumas fotos brasileiras que eu nomeei e que se tornaram FP: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Não pense que eu estou chateado porque você votou contra/"discordou" da foto, pelo contrário, a sua opinião é bem-vinda, eu estou aprendendo muita coisa com isso, com esta organização sem fins lucrativos, e com os seus usuários. Basicamente, eu aprendi coisas (muitas) sobre efeitos fotográficos, técnica para tirar fotos, métodos de edição da foto etc. E se eu estou errando em algo aqui, eu vou tentar acertar e melhorar. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
File:Amanhecer no Hercules --.jpgFile:Memorial J Kubitschek Brasilia statue.jpgFile:1 rocinha night 2014 panorama.jpg pra mim não seriam imagens para estar em destaque, a primeira tem um elemento grande de distração sem razão nenhuma para estar ali, e um pós-processamento muito além do ideal e muito mal feito, diga-se de passagem. A segunda não tem nada de especial... a terceira é muito interessante, mas tem muitas falhas de técnicas. Quase nenhuma das que você indicou tiveram massiva aceitação, e a razão é simples, têm muitos erros.
E tem um problema você ficar indicando dessa forma, depois pode ficar complicado indicar fotografias com temáticas brasileiras, pois as pessoas daqui estarão saturadas dessa chuva de fotografias meia boca.
Minha dica é limpar os olhos, aquieaqui a maioria dessas fotos sim, têm qualidade superior, e não tem tantas falhas técnicas.
E ai você pode começar a entender o quão brutal é a diferença entre as entradas que vc criou e uma imagem de qualidade. -- RTA16:38, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
@Rodrigo.Argenton: Compreendo. Eu já sei o que devo fazer... Eu me concentrava muito nisso do Brasil e me esquecia dos outros... Mas eu vou tentar agora não fazer mais isso, certo? Eu me restringia só nisso ou naquilo outro, e esquecia do resto do mundo. Pois tem tanto país aí e eu só ficava no Brasil... E RTA, se você precisar de nomear alguma imagem sua e não tiver como, por favor, contate-me e peça para mim que eu irei nomeá-la, ok? Best regards to you! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Acho que não entendeu...
Entrou nos links que lhe enviei? Se encontrar imagens aqui que tenham níveis semelhantes de qualidade, mesmo que sejam só do Brasil, acho interessante que você nomeei. Agora, precisa entender mais do que faz uma boa foto, e também abrir a imagem em sua maior qualidade possível e ver os detalhes. Sei que não tem o costume por suas indicações, volto de novo para a minha foto, que claramente quem votou à favor não o fez em tela cheia, já que estava grosseira a perda de dados...
Há outros elementos que devem ser considerados, exemplo: A foto do jardim botânico de Curitiba, a primeira que você nomeou é igual à praticamente 80% das fotos que você encontra se procurar jardim botânico Curitiba... uns 15% tem a estátua da fonte que deixa já a foto bem mais interessante, e aí vem as fotos únicas, que deveriam ser destaque, que tem aquele "wow" que se ler muitos ali esperam em uma FP. [3][4][5][6][7]. E pq isso ocorre, pq não é ordinário, pq seguem regras de composição, pq não têm falhas técnicas, pq a pessoa pensou antes de tirar a foto, chegou perto do seu objeto...
E antes que pense, não, não é exigência de mais, não, não estou exigindo que o cara seja profissional, há um degrau considerável entre as fotos que eu lhe mandei e fotos pro [8][9]...
Por tu ajuda na nominação de imagems de Brasil no commons, e por reconhecer a calidad do que realmente importa. Muito obrigado mi bom amigo The_Photographer (talk) 02:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
I have uploaded an alternative crop and would appreciate if you could indicate a preference, or that you have no strong preference. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 12:04, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your message.
You write under my photohttps://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Serratula_seoanei,_Zaagblad_02.JPG&oldid=prev&diff=150677034: Famberhorst Note: I suggest you renominate it. Because I do not know how the English language, I do not know exactly what you mean.
With regards,
Take care not to pick up some croped paitings (problem is it should never be croped, must not be !...and i dont check that, sometimes cant be checked neither), also if its not good IQ leave it for latter. Not all of them are good, despite beeing valuable. Regards. --Mile (talk) 12:16, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
But on wikipedia en - there is no part of Indonesia in Oceania - I hope you understand that Indonesia does not associate itself with oceania. It is in either Asia or South East Asia. sats (talk) 11:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
but, despite that edit, I have been told by an admin on wp en that it is likely that someone will revert that - despite the very specific project, portal and article about oceania - whcih actually exclude indonesia from it. as with commons the same with wp en - it is all the same, we need to grin and bear it ... sats (talk) 13:43, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Mas eu já visitei o Brazil mais de uma vez, ArionEstar! A última vez foi em 2009: estive em Ouro Preto (Belo Horizonte) e numa pequena cidade do estado de São Paulo, Presidente Prudente. Ia morrendo de calor! Também já lá tinha estado muitos anos antes: no Rio, em Belém e no Recife; mas nessa altura não havia fotografia digital! O problema é que vou sempre em trabalho, nunca em turismo. A próxima vez vai ser provavelmente em 2017: Belo Horizonte. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:05, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Olá, tudo bem? Fiz os ajustes prometidos, inclusive a imagem ficou maior mesmo com corte, melhorei a qualidade do exportação e nos detalhes. A legenda também está em inglês e português e com maiores detalhes.
@Webysther: Parabéns pela edição! Agora agora eu não posso nominar a foto pois já tenho 2 fotos nominadas, o máximo permitido, mas se você quiser, pode nominá-la. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:35, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
@Webysther: Eu tenho ajudado a aumentar a quantidade de fotos desta categoria: Category:Featured pictures of Brazil. Como eu não tenho câmera profissional, eu procuro fotos do Brasil aqui no Commoms e nomino-as. Se você quiser, pode também ajudar a aumentar essa categoria, fotografando e/ou nominando. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:30, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Trabalho realmente interessante, vou ajudar sim. Se você encontrar imagens ruins de locais em São Paulo que não tem registro melhor me avise, posso tentar produzir melhores imagens. -- Webysther (talk) 20:37, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Então, não sei como fazer isso, o movimento dela durante a exposição pode ter causado a duplicação, você poderia adicionar uma nota em um lugar que esteja incomodando? Abs. -- Webysther (talk) 10:34, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Olá, tudo bem? Depois dos problemas relacionados a ruído e nitidez em diversas imagens, eu percebi claramente que alguns problemas só podem ser resolvidos fazendo outra imagem (quando for possível). Foi com base nisso que sumi, estive estudando para saber o que poderia fazer para aumentar a nitidez em diversas situações e também o ruido, fiquei impressionado como são detalhes muito pequenos que transformam uma imagem de ruim para super nítida. Quando tiver um tempo, se puder dar uma olhada, estou enviando novas imagens aos poucos, mas com qualidade excepcional (nitidez/ruído), e o melhor de tudo, o mesmo equipamento. :)
Hi, She left Spain when she was very young, and never comes back. This picture was certainly not taken in Spain. So I would agree to add a category "People of Spain", when not "Pictures of Spain". Regards, Yann (talk) 18:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Featured Picture nominations: Groups of images
Hi,
I see you frequent the FP candidates page often, so I'd like to ask you how to nominate a group of images. The nomination guide on the FP candidates page mentions group nominations, but never explains how it's done. Any help really appreciated. --LB12:56, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Arion, i havent see you put some of your photo on voting. You dont make them ? I have a friend in Caonas, she is pro photograper. You migth start some if interested. Any camera you own ? --Mile (talk) 16:44, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
A shot from cell phonw, which isnt so bad. With some more serious cam you could gain up on a level. If some is into photo, and its his hobby, than that one will learn quick. Just spare some realos. --Mile (talk) 17:39, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
He stated in photo its High relieef, but migth be combined (from sunken) also as i can see. Should be shot from side to be more sure. --Mile (talk) 19:52, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Convite - Concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2015
Bem vindo ao Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2015 Patrimônio Natural
Olá ArionEstar,
No ano anterior você participou da primeira edição do concurso fotográfico Wiki Loves Earth Brasil enviando ótimas fotografias!
O concurso foi um grande sucesso graça a sua participação e ajuda!
Este ano estamos repetindo o sucesso do ano anterior, já são mais de 1.000 participantes e mais de 7.500 fotos recebidas até o momento.
Você poderá participar do concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2015 até o dia 31 de Maio e concorrer a R$9.000,00 em premiações!
Esta ano, estamos premiando 2 categorias, categoria melhor foto onde premiaremos as 3 melhores fotos do concurso e a categoria melhores contribuições onde premiaremos os usuários que mandarem a maior quantidade de fotos úteis.
Até o momento os 3 participantes que enviaram mais fotografias enviaram respectivamente 356, 297 e 93 fotografias.
Além da premiação em dinheiro, as melhores fotografias serão publicadas na edição de Agosto da revista impressa Fotografe Melhor da Editora Europa.
Agradecemos a sua participação desde já e obrigado pelas fotos enviadas no ano anterior!
Para maiores informações e para submeter suas novas fotografias, acesse o site do concurso e participe!
Contribua também divulgando para seus amigos e colegas e também curtindo nossa página no Facebook e seguindo nossa conta no Twitter.
Em breve anunciaremos novidades sobre os vencedores e a exposição das melhores fotografias do concurso.
Atenciosamente,
Comitê organizador do Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2015
Você ainda poderá submeter mais fotos até o dia 31 de maio e ampliar suas chances na premiação de até R$2.000,00!
Estamos premiando 2 categorias, categoria melhor foto onde premiaremos as 3 melhores fotos do concurso e a categoria melhores contribuições onde premiaremos os usuários que mandarem a maior quantidade de fotos úteis.
Até o momento os 3 participantes que enviaram mais fotografias enviaram respectivamente 356, 297 e 93 fotografias.
Além da premiação em dinheiro, as melhores fotografias serão publicadas na edição de Agosto da revista impressa Fotografe Melhor da Editora Europa.
Agradecemos a sua participação desde já, obrigado pelas fotos enviadas, elas serão usadas em vários dos nossos projetos.
Para melhorar suas chances envie mais fotos para o concurso. acesse o site do concurso e submeta mais fotografias!
Contribua também divulgando para seus amigos, contatos e curtindo nossa página no Facebook e seguindo nossa conta no Twitter.
Em breve anunciaremos novidades sobre os vencedores e a exposição das melhores fotografias do concurso.
Atenciosamente,
Comitê organizador do Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2015
As this tilt fix is just a so minor fix there, then maybe it should still be practical to apply it to the original image? Or what do you think? Kruusamägi (talk) 09:09, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Realmente o WLE 2014 e WLE 2015 foram um grande sucesso, mas há muito trabalho a ser feito. Aproveitando seu interesse, gostaria de convida-lo para nos ajudar no processo de revisão das fotos recebidas. Temos 13.000 fotos do WLE 2015 para filtrar e selecionar as melhores para que os jurados possam dar nota. Tenho várias boas idéias, o que falta é gente pra apoiar o trabalho. Se tiver com tempo aí, entre em contato por email rodrigopadula AT gmail DOT com ou por aqui mesmo, que daí te passo os links, login e senha para acessar a ferramenta do concurso WLE. Conto com sua colaboração. Rodrigo Padula (talk) 17:28, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Topa dar uma revisada nas fotos no sistema? Temos que filtrar todas as fotos enviadas para que os jurados possam dar nota. É um sistema externo desenvolvido pelo pessoal da Ucrania. Eles criaram uma conta única que estamos utilizando para filtrar e em seguida repassar para os jurados do concurso. Rodrigo Padula (talk) 01:18, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
@Rodrigo Padula: Não sei, se isso não me custar muito tempo… Mas eu vou ver o que eu posso fazer. Eu posso avaliá-las, mas não sei se eu vou conseguir avaliar todas. Como funciona método de avaliação? Parece que não, mas eu tenho só 1 ano e pouco de Commons. Tem muita coisa que ainda eu não sei mexer por aqui. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:25, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
O sistema de avaliação é fora do commons, é bem simples, me mande um email que te passo as orientações, login e senha, não posso passar por aqui :-) Rodrigo Padula (talk) 14:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
There are a lot of uncategorized FPs out there. What I do is categorize the newly promoted ones, but I only started this effort maybe two years ago. The older FPs remain forgotten, for most of them, outside of the FP category tree. Thierry Caro (talk) 10:51, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Remember that you asked me to fix the EXIF on this file?
Well, it turns out that my 'fix' introduced another problem in the EXIF as it stripped the sRGB colour profile data due to an error in the script I used (it has now been corrected). I am now in the process of the repairing the damage done on all the uploads where I have used this script with errors.
So, I would like to upload a new version of this photo by Webysther, where this problem with the color profile data is fixed, but it requires that I use the original where the profile data is in it to derive a corrected version, and since then you have edited the picture as well by cropping it. So, it takes a little more.
If I upload a new version based on the original with correct EXIF (and intact colour profile) data would you then be willing to crop it again as you did previously? -- Slaunger (talk) 11:54, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
You were asking me why my upload of File:Leonardo da Vinci - presumed self-portrait - lossless.png was in png. I've decided to create a little guide for commons on this as I haven't found anything like it. I'd be happy if you could take a look at the very early draft I've made and decide for yourself if you feel it seems reasonable.
Olá, tento tocar esse projeto pelo potencial não explorado que vejo aqui na comunidade brasileira. Ano passado geramos ótimos resultados e esse ano dobramos, então sigo apoiando. Queria ajudar mais, mas acabo ficando sobrecarregado fazendo quase tudo do concurso.Bora fazer uma força tarefa para organização dessas fotos e uso na Wikipédia?
Hi, Please do not renominate a file you just withdrew. More generally, you should choose more carefully your nominations. The remark about your withdraws was quite right actually. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:32, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Excuse me Arion but I have Withdrawn my photo that you were appointed because they were starting to get to me, sorry for the inconvenience. See the bright side, you can appoint someone else. Hello and sorry again . --LivioAndronico(talk)21:24, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Charlesjsharp! I recommend you visit Brazil. This vast country is home to unique natural life. It is abundant in splendid landscapes. Visit Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Brasília and many other cities! Visit Brazil someday! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:09, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Good idea... Already done Rio and Iguassu and going in September 2015 to the Pantanal and Southern Amazon Basin for a couple of weeks. You'll hopefully see my pictures in October!! Charles (talk) 16:18, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hey Arion, check this, maybe is worth to nominate, or not. Not mine, but saw it, nice pattern. Whats with your camera, make any progress ? regards, --Mile (talk) 16:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Might be, but first is good as pattern, second is more strange crop. You should take some rest, or slow down a bit. --Mile (talk) 17:06, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, You should select candidates better instead of nominating all nice images you find, and then withdrawing a little later. I already asked you that above, as well as Jee. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:29, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Olá ArionEstar, percebi que você tem uma grande experência em nomear belas imagens para destaque, você poderia me dar algumas dicas sobre o que observar nas imagens para verificar se atende os requisitos? Dei uma lida em Commons:Image guidelines, mas fiquei com algumas dúvidas. Por exemplo, achei essa imagem muito boa File:Calice.JPG, o que você achou? Rodrigolopes (talk) 12:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Olá Arion, sem querer atrapalhar, mas já atrapalhando, indiquei a imagem File:Aquário Natural.jpg para QI e me foi solicitado noise reduction e um melhor crop. Você poderia me dar alguma dica em como fazer esse tal de noise reduction. Rodrigolopes (talk) 15:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Kinda. I'm going to have to start over - the original image that one was based upon was a very bad copy of the one (now?) on Gallica, so there's no point starting with it. I can certainly improve the image, though. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:00, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Going to see what Crisco thinks about the colours and crop. If he's happy, you'll probably see it at FPC. (En-wiki's; Commons tends to slow down my nominations enough that he could be a while) Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:29, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the nomination. I noticed it just yesterday for I didn't have a look on the FP-candidates in the last two weeks --Llez (talk) 16:55, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
CONVITE - CONCURSO FOTOGRÁFICO Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2015 Patrimônio Histórico
Olá ArionEstar,
Obrigado por ter participado do concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2014/2015.
Ao longo destas duas edições contamos com a participação de quase 3.000 fotógrafos e recebemos ao todo mais de 20.000 imagens que estão sendo usadas para ilustrar artigos da Wikipédia e enriquecendo o nosso repositório de imagens aqui no Wikimedia Commons. Devido ao grande sucesso das duas edições do WLE, decidimos trazer para o Brasil o maior concurso fotográfico do mundo, que será realizado de 1 a 30 de setembro de 2015.
O Wiki Loves Monuments é organizado em vários países do mundo e é considerado desde 2011 pelo Livro dos Recordes como maior concurso fotográfico do mundo. Estamos aqui para te convidar a fazer parte da historia e do maior concurso fotográfico já realizado!
É que vc não viu a diferença entre a parede os vitrais, esse o limite, começa a ficar estranho... já está bem longe da realidade eheheheheh... mas antes não dava pra ver o vitral, agora vc pode ver Jesus... -- RTA10:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
@Rodrigo.Argenton: Sério cara? Eu pensei que é a iluminação da igreja que não é boa, então eu achei que não seria culpa sua. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk)
Daria para ir de noite, em que eles ligam as luzes de dentro, e o vitral simplesmente ficaria na mesma luz... na verdade eu precisava passar mais do que 15 min na igreja pra saber quais seriam as melhores luzes. -- RTA10:42, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Mas estava escura, culpa minha de insistir de tirar naquela luz, se olhar Exposure time 1/40 sec (0.025), essa é a mais escura, a que eu mandei pra vc ver nesse link...
ahhhhh, tá forte a edição, não é fp mesmo, mas dá pra arrumar... mas essa File:Palacete Azul 04.jpg tá mais interessante... nunca tinha visto lustres assim, e olhando assim temos a grande diferença. -- RTA11:10, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
@Rodrigo.Argenton: O que você acha que poderia fazer com a foto? A composição é muito boa e o ângulo é quase perfeito. O lustre está devidamente centralizado na imagem, mas por causa do ângulo quase que perfeito, parece que tem mais espaço de um lado do que de outro. Qualidade é boa eu penso, mas eu sinto falta de um pouquinho de brilho. Na minha opinião a segunda foto estaria mais interessante se estive mais espaço em baixo, está muito apertado o assunto. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi Arion, I saw that other pic, its not more interesting than first option, composition is not so good. So no benefit of improving. Problem is also WB is pretty off, I would need RAW file to make it similar like we already have now. --Mile (talk) 08:36, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello Arion, I am now at home and just reworked and uploaded a new version of that file. I have serious doubts that it can become FP because, even after the rework, the image quality is not really good. Sorry, I cannot do magic... :( Poco213:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.
To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.
I did it, check it, I hope is near what it have to be, but some crop was made due to it. Hope OK with others. --Mile (talk) 16:24, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Yes, true. My country...small, sporty and proud nation. We can be bombed by whole NATO for 3 months but be dot get scared. We keep our friends and never turn them back, what I am proud of. Our soul prefer more East mind than West, we like more BRICS than NATO. --Mile (talk) 08:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
@PetarM: Historically, your country is very good to study: the context of the Cold War, the Kosovo situation, the relations with neighboring countries... Here in Brazil, though few know Serbia, we have a vision of Europe = Money, money, money, capitalism, the best HDI, not slum, not poverty... The richest continent... But each country has its peculiarities. Here, Brazil has great natural beauties, a continental dimension, a strong biodiversity, but the healthy and the education... Soooooo bad (and other issues)! Greetings to Serbia! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:43, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
True, our people are smart, Tesla was Serbian. Problem is we were 500 years under Turks, which made lot of damage and slow the progress, then we have 2 world wars and Germans want to extinct Slavic people, fasizm... But we are going up. Kosovo, one more case of western (American) hegemony. Now that time is over. I will have guests from Brasil in January, a couple from Caonas and Porto Alegre. For education, I am sure will be better and better, just don't get too much energy on that football. --Mile (talk) 17:02, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
@PetarM: The big evil of Brazil is only thinking about football and forget the other things... People just want to think about getting drunk, partying, but few people are interested in the social development of the country (health, education, poverty, HDI)... I can say that few Brazilians know Commons, for example. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for nominating my image. Much appreciated. Charles (talk) 09:43, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi - how do I send a thanks message?, like you did to me - can't work it out... Charles (talk) 16:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Arion - question...since the TIF and JPG are exactly the same image (just on different formats) would you log your support in the TIF section rather than the JPG section? That's why I noted there was a JPG available and linked it. I wanted to avoid 3 different consensus sections and a fragmented consensus. Thx in advance!! ~~~~ {{unsigned|Atsme|23:01, 31 October 2015}}
Oh, my! I entirely missed that requirement in the candidacy guidelines. In fact, I thought PNG and TIF were the preferred formats because they are of much higher quality. Would you be so kind as to point me to the JPG requirement because I've been unable to locate it, and I don't want my work being dismissed simply because I failed to upload it on a lesser format. Thanks in advance....Atsme😊Consult23:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
@Atsme: TIF, PNG, GIF and SVG are commonly used for animations and images generated from virtual programs. Anyway, it's a great work! More animals in water! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Ow, quando vc remove algo da foto, tipo uma pessoa, você deve criar outro arquivo, clone stamp não é nada aceito em várias situações, e o que você fez aqui: File:Sunset at Noronhas' beach.jpg, deveria ter sido feito em um arquivo separado, e como eu disse, é uma foto bem merda do ponto de vista educacional, principalmente quando você retirou a escala. Só passou para provocarem o Colin... vc está abaixando o nível das FP e dê um jeito de arrumar essa porqueira que vc fez, por favor. -- RTA08:13, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Tirando outra foto, com uma câmera melhor, ou com o tripé e 70 fotos... a costura eu não tinha reparado, o ruído não tem como mesmo, para ter noção são 7 fotos na direita para ficar com o ruído que está, repare que na esquerda está bem pior, que acho que tem umas 3 fotos, fiz correndo, tinha outras coisas por fazer.
Ué, ele embargou a votação anterior... é uma foto de qualidade muito duvidável pra passar assim.
O problema é que a votação foi para a sua versão, eu sugiro reupar em um arquivo separado, e mandar o FP para a outra versão. -- RTA13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Ah, eu poderia criar fp de lugar, mas dá muuito trampo e eu não curto, acaba tirando o propósito. :P talvez eu faça uma na sexta. -- RTA15:25, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you select the image and have it presented as FP. I hesitated to introduced myself and when I see the results of voting, I have no regrets that you ayiez before me. Thank you again.
(Obrigado selecione a imagem e tê-lo apresentado como FP. Hesitei em me apresentei e quando eu ver os resultados da votação, eu não tenho arrependimentos que você ayiez antes de mim. Obrigado mais uma vez.) --Medium69You wanted talk to me?12:25, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
* Feliz Año Nuevor! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
Deseo que este nuevo año venga cargado de bienaventuranza para ti y para los tuyos. Un año nuevo lleno de muchos nuevos retos que yo estoy seguro conseguirás superar. Te he dejado este video, con un mensaje positivo, lleno de esperanza y amor. De mi, un Venezolano que te aprecia. Saludos --The Photographer (talk) 15:28, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Arion, I was in your country, in Rio de Janeiro and I took this picture, I put the original link to RAW files. Could you see if it is possible to fix perspectives, do you know this cathedral to do it? Regards!! --Ezarateesteban14:27, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Você tem um bom coração e capacidad de ajudar a outras pessoas, você sempre esta ficando muito atento com a qualidade das imagems no commons. Obrigado por fazer este espaço mais agradavel. The Photographer (talk) 19:12, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Olá, tenho acompanhando suas colaborações aqui no commons e gostaria de te convidar para nos dar uma força no Wiki Loves Earth Brasil. Organizo este concurso desde 2014 para trazer mais gente pro commons e conteúdos de boa qualidade para ilustrar a Wikipédia. Estamos com uma foçar tarefa, se tiver interesse e tempo em ajudar, será otimo para melhorarmos os resultados do WLE 2016. Abraços Rodrigo Padula (talk) 06:13, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Convite
Olá, queria aproveitar a oportunidade do WLE para convidá-lo para fazer parte do corpo de jurados que avaliará as fotos vencedoras do concurso em Julho. Normalmente filtramos cerca de 500 fotos dentre todas recebidas para que os jurados avaliem dando notas de 1-10 segundo qualidade artistica e tecnica. Caso tenha interesse e disponibilidade, entre em contato. Abraços Rodrigo Padula (talk) 13:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Porra
Eu já não gosto nenhum pouco de lidar com a Wikipédia, não dá, só tem gente porcaria lá, e você vai e faz uma copyvio que eu tenho de reverter e agora um idiota reverte para a sua violação. Você não tem noção como isso me alterou, acabou com a porra do meu dia ter que fazer essa reversão, de novo, pq vcs não leem uma porcaria que está em literalmente todas as páginas, todas as páginas, de todas as Wikis. Muito obrigado mesmo. Saco. -- RTA04:29, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Not sure why you reverted to the old file because the change was made by an admin. As I recall, the newly named cropped image was promoted to FA. Atsme📞18:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Nope - they supported the cropped version. Promoted File:Yellow papillae flatworm (Thysanozoon nigropapillosum) (cropped).jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 5:58 am, 22 December 2015, Tuesday (5 months, 11 days ago) (UTC−6)
This nomination was very close, with essentialy everyone supporting both versions. However, as 2 users expressed a preference for the cropped version, this is the one that get's promoted. Armbrust The Homunculus 5:58 am, 22 December 2015, Tuesday (5 months, 11 days ago) (UTC−6)Atsme📞18:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
What about this? (cur | prev) 13:22, December 16, 2015 Crisco 1492 (talk | contribs) m . . (545 bytes) (0) . . (Crisco 1492 moved page File:Flatworm.jpg to File:Yellow papillae flatworm (Thysanozoon nigropapillosum).jpg: specific species id) (undo | thank) Atsme📞18:30, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you!! My heart starts racing when a move or name change is needed. I am clueless about that part of the process (and worse when it comes to categories). Also, thank you for the congrats - it was such an honor for me to have 2 images nominated by my peers. Atsme📞18:48, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Not as nice as France-my-fatherland, of course, but it deserves some (a lot of !) visits ! I'm trying to buy a holiday house there...--Jebulon (talk) 17:55, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Your opinion about this diagram
Hello dear ArionEstar. I would be glad to know your opinion about this image. I spent hours to illustrate it so it definitely will be important for me to know and see your opinion in this page. Thank you and also thanks for your contributions on Wikimedia projects. Ali Zifan22:51, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
I just realized that I never exactly answered your question about what "perfect" is to me, so here it is: Wabi-sabi, that is the sort of aesthetic I treasure most of all. That is beauty to me. w.carter-Talk17:30, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but until March 2017 I can not vote for a six-month blockade that has been imposed on me in this discussion, so do not be offended is not out of malice. For the rest if I am a servant here. Greetings --LivioAndronico(talk)08:45, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Please excuse me spamming you, which concerns Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign. My contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. I has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and it is very expensive for me to acquire this equipment. I has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a camera with a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevskytalk19:16, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and Happy new year!
Merry Christmas, ArionStar!
English: Hellow ArionStar, Merci/Gracias/Thanks my friend for do it posible, this family of Commons, beleave that we can change world improving the educational media disponible. Take care by your self --The Photographer03:00, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Olá Arion, muito obrigado pelo gesto de vir aqui a se despedir. No primer momento eu senti muita tristeza, porém, eu entendo que existen prioridades que vc precisa atender, a wiki pode esperar. Eu também pase momentos muito gratos com você e muitas veces quando eu estava um pouco desencorajado vc sempre estava ali para me apoiar. Você e meu amigo, não conheço a você pessoalmente mas gostaria algum dia. Obrigado por formar parte de minha vida aqui eternamente grato. The Photographer00:41, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
I think it would be a good courtesy to leave a talk-page not for newbies (redlink users) when their images get nominated at FPC. Otherwise they may have no clue. -- Colin (talk) 20:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Yes I looked at that list of contributions, although I guess we can disagree about what 'regular' is, I did see a lot of their own work contributed. So I chose to be inclusive and count them as part of the community here and as an active user. I also expressed my disagreement with sharing a link to their Facebook profile on here. Even if it is a publicly available profile, I don't think it was really very appropriate to do that, even though you were trying to help other users understand who the author was/give them more information about it. It feels like too much personal information was 'exposed' when the user is not an outsider to the community and has an account here. I take from my own experience that I would not like my Facebook profile linked on here, just as a personal decision. Would you consider removing the link? Let me know your thoughts. Cheers, seb26 (talk) 19:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Não preciso dizer que você tem minha expressa autorização para realizar cortes ou o que achar melhor para qualquer imagem que eu fizer de forma irrevogável, SEJE feliz. -- Webysther (talk) 22:18, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Aproveitando, se você achar boas imagens de outros lugares no Brasil mas que precisava ser feita com maior qualidade vai me passando que eu coloco em uma lista para fazer. Vale para todo o Brasil. --Webysther (talk) 22:23, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
@Webysther: Engraçado que eu sempre editei fotos aqui no Commons e ninguém falava nada sobre consentimento de autor, agora que está acontecendo isso… Já que você falou, observei que não temos muitas imagens de qualidade de capitais estaduais (exceto São Paulo e Rio, que detêm o monopólio, inclusive São Paulo possui The Photographer, que inclusive é da Venezuela, como fotógrafo regular); se você analisar bem, temos mais imagens destacadas do interior do Brasil do que nas metrópoles e centros urbanos. Nesses quatro anos de Wiki vi o número de fotos do Brasil explodir como nunca, até mais do que certos países da Europa. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:47, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Não temos mais o @The Photographer: , parece que ele foi morar em outro país, se eu não entendi errado ele foi morar no Canadá. Vou me basear bastante no legado que ele deixou. Tem como ser mais preciso sobre as fotos? Tipo: "Webysther faz uma foto de tal catedral, a foto xyz que você pode ter uma idéia tem tais problemas...". Dessa forma eu posso me planejar melhor. Estarei indo para Minas Gerais pelos próximos meses. --Webysther (talk) 17:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Before the calendar turns a new leaf over, before the social networking sites get flooded with messages, before the mobile networks get congested, let me take a quiet moment out to wish you a wonderful, happy, healthy and prosperous New Year.
Cuidado só com as nomeações cara, tem gente que... putz, melhor dar uma evitada viu? Ainda mais depois de tudo que rolou aqui no Brasil quanto a Wikimedia, você não tem noção a bola de bosta de neve que algumas coisas podem virar. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m05:21, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
@Rodrigo.Argenton: Oi kkkk Fiquei um certo tempo inativo no Commons e quando apareci, já rolou treta kkkk Estão acontecendo duas discussões ao mesmo na página, e como diz o bom e velho meme da Glória Pires: “Não sou capaz de opinar” kkkkkkk 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:39, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Pan de jamón and Hallaca are a typical Christmas dish of my country, and I would like to share it with you, wishing you the best year 2019.. I would like to give you this humble recognition. Happy year 2019 dear!!! Photographer01:44, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
FP
Hi, I think Basile's critic is quite right. It is useless to nominate smartphone pictures. Regards, Yann (talk) 01:10, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eye of the Bird.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
Hi Arion, You need to answer questions. You can write in Portuguese if you are not comfortable writing in English. But for now, you are blocked for 3 days. You cannot be retired, and then at the same post again low quality nominations on FPC, as you were requested not to do. I hope you understand, and come back with more useful nominations. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:59, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal!
With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
@ArionEstar: Tudos pasamos por momentos asim mas depois voltamos, nao se que aconteceu mas nao deixe que pessoas desviem voce do caminho do bem, de mostrar ao Brasil com contenido de alta qualidade, tenho sentido saudades do senhor. Faz pouco fui para o Brasil. Por favor, si acontece de novo me chama para brigar eu tambem --Wilfredor (talk) 00:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Tudos eles ficarom defendendo ao senhor hasta que você ficou chateado. Aqui tem muitos caras malucos que tentan tirar você arrumando qualquer desculpa. O importante e não se deixar levar pelas emoções. Olha o que aconteceu comigo a semana pasada, eu fui bloqueado na wikipedia en portugués por querer colocar uma melhor foto no artigo da estação da luz, uma foto que já tínhamos discutido na página de discussão do artigo, então vem Chronos e me bloqueou, o cara acha que os artigos são dele. Resumindo, a gente tem que se apoiar nestas coisas cara, escribe no meu e-mail e ali eu passo meno número para você, também o teles acho que foi embora --Wilfredor (talk) 02:49, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Oi Wil, em relação ao país, está menos pior que outros países da Europa, não sei se acompanha os noticiários internacionais; particularmente, eu estou passando por alguns problemas e vou ficar fora do nicho desgastante do Commons por um longo tempo ainda mais. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 14:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Mas vc acha que ta menos pior por causa de que a doenca chegou depois no Brasil?, fico triste que voce tenha pasado mal, por favor, fica a vontade de me pedir si vc acha que eu posso ajudar em alguma coisa. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:56, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Wilfredor, sim e porque tem menos mortes, ainda não estamos em lockdown; eu acho que este projeto é uma perda de tempo pra minha vida, não me faz mais feliz, nem menos triste, então sai, tenho problemas internos mais sérios para resolver do que me desgastar com algo que não me satisfaz. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 15:38, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Pega tipo umas ferias e ali depois voce ve si quiser voltar ou nao. Muitas veces o que precisamos e tempo para pensar e solucionar outros problemas mais importantes em nossa vida depois acontece que tudo fica melhor. Tudo o mundo fica con saudades do senhor. Boa quarentena para voce tambem --Wilfredor (talk) 15:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Sajid-Wajid (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
Todos nós passamos por conflitos semelhantes, o importante é conversar com alguém sobre isso, se precisar falar sobre isso pode me escrever pelo whatsapp +15817772704. Abraços meu amigo, e lembre-se que o importante não é cair nesses buracos, mas sim levantar e sair deles. BTW, obrigado pela nominacao meu --Wilfredor (talk) 12:26, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
File:General Constand Viljoen (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derived from a deleted file
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
I cannot believe that I spelled Brazil wrong in making that category, and that no one noticed until now. Good for youǃ ̴̃ Krok6kola (talk) 00:42, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi, sorry, but you can't just go about moving your user page when you change username, the same way you do when you move files or other pages. All your links are now broken at every edit you've ever made. Please read Commons:Changing username and ask an admin for help to do this the right way so everything works again. Best, --Cart(talk)21:56, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Don't be sad or upset, you can get your name changed as much as you want, but it has to be done by applying for it so you don't lose all the good things you've done here on the site. Just talk to the right people and they will help you with it. You were just a little impulsive. --Cart(talk)22:59, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi Arion! I got a message from Aristeas, about some problems that occurred because of the moving and things you did on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bebe Rexha @ Wiltern 06 30 2023 (53047143292).jpg. Once again, you were a little bit too eager to move pages without thinking about the consequences. Your edits messed up the whole timeline that should be preserved intact, to show other users how this image made its way to become FP. Aristeas will revet and fix things the right way again. I'm just leaving you this message so you will not be alarmed about what's going on. You do good work, but you are a little bit too enthusiastic about moving files sometimes. All the best, --Cart(talk)09:04, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
One move can often be made without disrupting links and history, but to move again and even want to delete one of the files involved in the process, will create a total mess. Tm is also being made aware to be careful about consequences of moving files. This is not about who made what, or who is right or wrong, just trust Aristeas to fix it so your nomination will be ok. --Cart(talk)10:08, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
All this drama and mess would have been avoided if you, Arion, checked and fixed the images before you made the nomination. This is not the first time I've asked you this, and now I'm begging you to please, please, please, make sure file name, categories, and description are ok. Look for noise, CA or any other things that may come up during the voting. Ask for help first and nominate after that. You have been here long enough to know what a good photo should look like. That way, your nominations wouldn't be the workshops they often turn into, with all the complications and extra work that brings. I am begging you!!! --Cart(talk)15:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Arion, this is indeed a very beautiful photo, thank you for finding it! However, as Ikan noted, the CAs are a problem. Please wait a bit with nominating this photo again. Some friends and I am discussing right now how we could remove the CAs in the best way. If we find a good solution, the nomination will certainly be successful. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 13:19, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
@Aristeas: Oh hey! I will wait for the improvements for sure! Thanks! (P.S.: You can renominate that one after the changes, too) ★15:58, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Olá, ArionStar, tudo bem? Vi que você tem feito um ótimo trabalho ao propor diversas imagens ao destaque, das quais muitas foram aprovadas. Você acha que esta foto teria chances de ser aprovada?--Agent010 (talk) 17:39, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Olá e obrigado pelo reconhecimento! Olha, as imagens que você linkou estão com as cores muito saturadas e parece que passaram por oversharpening. Você pode dar uma lida nas diretrizes (Commons:FPC) e comparar com minhas imagens promovidas. ;) ★18:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Entendi, vou olhar. Eu estava pesquisando umas imagens no Flickr e achei algumas fotos de que preciso (como essa) cuja licença é aceita aqui. Só que essas fotos estão cheias de marca d'água, o que polui muito a qualidade das imagens. Existe alguma forma de carregá-las aqui sem essas marcas? Se não me engano, já vi imagens desse mesmo perfil ser carregadas aqui só que sem a marca d'água, embora no Flickr ainda tivesse essa marca (não me lembro que imagens foram).--Agent010 (talk) 22:43, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Creio que não seja pra mim, muito complicado haha. Mas se for o caso de carregar as imagens com aquelas marcas d'água pra cá não tem problema, né?--Agent010 (talk) 13:38, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Você pode me chamar no WhatsApp se quiser, lá é bem melhor para discutir estas questões: +55 27 99718-8569.★19:25, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Certo. Na verdade, o WhatApp que possuo atulmente é da empresa (compartilhado). Mas podemos conversar por e-mail, pode ser?--Agent010 (talk) 14:21, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Ola!, can you please explain me what are you doing with the series of Iceland geysers? Area you seriously about putting each image of the frame on the front page one week long? have you discussed it somewhere? Poco a poco (talk) 22:05, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
I enjoy seeing my pictures on the front page, but not sure what others would say. Often there have been arguments like not too many pictures of the same author or topic (and this is both). Poco a poco (talk) 16:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!
Merry Christmas and a joyous new year filled with peace, love, and happiness!
Щасливого Різдва та Нового року, нехай він принесе мир, любов та радість у ваше життя!
Joyeux Noël et une Bonne année pleine de paix, d'amour et de bonheur!
¡Feliz Navidad y un próspero año nuevo lleno de paz, amor y felicidad!
Buon Natale e un felice anno nuovo pieno di pace, amore e felicità!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr voller Frieden, Liebe und Glück!
Feliz Natal e um Ano Novo próspero repleto de paz, amor e felicidade!
メリークリスマス、そして平和と愛、幸福に満ちた新年おめでとうございます!
메리 크리스마스와 평화, 사랑, 행복이 가득한 새해 복 많이 받으세요!
मेरी क्रिसमस और शांति, प्रेम, और खुशियों से भरा नया साल मुबारक हो!
圣诞快乐,新年快乐,愿你的生活充满和平、爱与幸福!
عيد ميلاد مجيد وسنة جديدة سعيدة مليئة بالسلام والحب والسعادة!
С Рождеством и Новым Годом, пусть они принесут мир, любовь и счастье в вашу жизнь!
God Jul och Gott Nytt År fyllt med fred, kärlek och lycka!
Vrolijk Kerstfeest en een Gelukkig Nieuwjaar vol vrede, liefde en geluk!
Kia ora, ArionStar, have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! Thank you for all the hard work you've put in the last year to make Wikimedia Commons the place it is today. Enjoy the festive season from wherever you are in the globe.
You downloaded 7 pictures of the day by Diego Delso (User: Poco a poco) in November 2024, thereby violating the requirement of paragraph 7 of the Instructions (There is a limit of two images/month per author). In total, 9 works by the author Diego Delso were posted in November (1, 15, 24-30). Please replace them with images from other authors. ValeriySh (talk) 05:47, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Olá, ArionStar, sou eu de novo :D. Tudo bem? Estou tentando carregar esta imagem, que está em "Domínio Público", só que, quando carrego o link direto do Flickr, aparece as seguintes opções: "- Direitos de liberação" e, principalmente, "Insira uma licença diferente em formato Wikitexto. - A seleção é obrigatória.
Este arquivo está sujeito à seguinte licença no site "Flickr": Public Domain Mark.". O que devo colocar em "Insira uma licença diferente em formato Wikitexto"? Não estou conseguindo carregar essa e outras imagens por causa disso. Poderias me ajudar? Saudações.--Agent010 (talk) 16:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
@Agent010: Olá, prazer em revê-lo! Selecione "Creative Commons Renúncia CC0", que é a licença fornecida pelo link que você me enviou (clique em "código legal" para checar se a página da licença bate com a da fornecida pelo link). Sempre confira sob qual licença as imagens que você costuma encontrar pelo Flickr está disponibilizada. Espero ter ajudado! ★16:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Hey, Star, tudo bem? Agora que vi sua mensagem lá em Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:1Catedral Metropolitana de São Paulo.jpg. Pelo jeito, o processo parece ser um pouco mais complexo do que eu imaginava (ou mesmo mais complexo que destacar artigos) hahaha. Como estou viajando, não tenho muito tempo para focar nas observações e comentários que vão deixando lá. Seria possível anular essa candidatura? Talvez, quando eu voltar de viagem, eu leia com mais atenção os critérios de como destacar uma imagem. Agradeço! --Agent010 (talk) 14:10, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Está certo. Eu estava vendo que esta imagem foi carregada do Pexels. Entrando no site, achei outras imagens boas (1, 2, 3, por exemplo) que eu gostaria de usar em artigos. Como faço para carregá-las aqui? Basta eu baixá-las, subi-las aqui e colocar o link e a permissão (CC 0 license) de onde a encontrei?--Agent010 (talk) 23:52, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Ariel, it is very sweet that you care so much for Wilfredor, but he is not giving up or going away forever. You are still very young, and hopefully you have not yet encountered sorrows so great that they turn your world upside down. When that happens, people often need help from professionals. Friends don't have the necessary knowledge that is needed to heal, and stressful environments are not helping. We all just want Wilfredor to get better, gather strength and come back to FPC, but for now he probably needs some time away from demands like FPC. I am an old woman, something like your abuela, and as such I have lived a long life and seen much, so I can give advice to those who are younger and care for them. So don't rush Wilfredor, just be there as a friend if he wants to talk. All the best, --Cart(talk)18:27, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Stop Putler sign.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.
Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
@ArionStar: I agree with the potential DW issue. I wonder if you can blur the banner, but of course once you blur the banner, the image is not going to pass the FPC, therefore I also agree to withdraw the FP nomination. --A1Cafel (talk) 10:45, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
John XXIII's portrait is not so high resolution. Might be OK for the English Wikipedia, but not enough for Commons. Yann (talk) 13:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
I understand that you're trying to find male nudes that could be FP-worthy. I think Dall'Orto's work is great, though a bit old (and this shows in the technical quality of the images). But I also think there are better images there, I like this and this one for instance, especially because these are not headless (I understand the need for anonymity for queer men) but both are more explicit. However, if the rules allow, why not go for these? UnpetitproleX(Talk)13:28, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
@UnpetitproleX: they will not be FPs, no one will vote for something that the majority does not see as an attractive/appealing composition. Try to nominate them. ★14:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)