Commons:秀逸な画像の推薦
ここにある画像は秀逸な画像への候補画像です。 今日の一枚とは異なりますのでご注意ください。
概要
[edit]推薦にあたって
[edit]推薦者のためのガイドライン
[edit]まずはじめに、『秀逸な画像ガイドライン』、『画像のガイドライン』をお読みください。
ここでは推薦画像の評価を受ける・する際の必要事項を要約して紹介します。
- 解像度 - 200万ピクセル以下の写真画像は、特別な理由が無い限り却下されます。1,600 x 1,200 ピクセル(1.92メガピクセル)は200万ピクセルには届いていない事にご注意ください。
- コモンズに置かれた画像は一般的なPCモニターのみで閲覧されるとは限らず、プリントアウトや高解像度モニターで表示される可能性もあります。将来的にもどのような機器が用いられるようになるかは誰にも予想出来ないので、推薦画像が可能な限り高い解像度を保っている事は重要な事なのです。
- スキャン画像 - 公式な方針ではありませんが、Help:スキャニングページで各種様々な画像を準備するための有用なアドバイスが提供されています。
- フォーカス - 通常、重要な被写体は全て焦点が合っていなければいけません。
- 前景と背景 - 前景や背景に主題ではない物が写り込むと、それは“余計なもの”になり得ます。前景にある物が主題の重要な部分を隠していないか、背景にあるものが構図を損ねていないか(例:後ろの街灯が人物の頭の上から生えているように見える、等)を確認しましょう。
- 全体品質 - 推薦される画像には高い技術品質が要求されます。
- デジタル補正 - 見る人を欺いてはいけません。写真画像のキズ・ホコリ等を修正する、良い編集、故意に人を騙す目的でない限り、デジタル補正は一般的に歓迎されます。例を挙げると、色合い/露出補正、シャープ/ボカシ、遠近感歪み補正、トリミング(切り取り)等がこれにあたります。背景に写り込んだ余計な物を取り除く等のさらに大がかりな修正は、{{Retouched picture}}テンプレートを画像ページへ貼付け、修正した旨を記述しましょう。記述漏れや記述ミスがある等、主題を不正確に見せる編集は決して受け入れられません。
- 価値 - 『全ての画像の中でも特に際立ち、最も価値のある画像』が我々の大きな目標です。秀逸な画像はそれぞれの分野の中でも別格でなけらばならず、故に次の点に留意して下さい。
- たいていの夕日は美しく見えますが、そういう画像のほとんどは他の夕日画像と大差ありません。
- 夜景は美しいですが、普通は日中に撮影された写真の方がより詳細を見せてくれます。
- 必ずしも『美しさに価値がある』わけではありません。
技術的側面では『露出』、『構図』、『動感表現』、『被写界深度』等を見ます。
- 露出とはシャッタースピードと絞りとの組み合わせの事を言い、適切なトーンカーブが見せる陰影〜ハイライトが有用なディティールを描写します。これをラティチュード(露光寛容度)と言い、このラティチュードの陰影〜ハイライトの領域内において、画像を暗め、中庸、明るめに作る事が出来ますが、デジタルカメラ及びデジタル画像はこのラティチュードの範囲がフィルムに比べて狭いです。ディティールの欠損した影部分は必ずしも「悪い」わけではなく、実際にその様な効果が望ましい場合(部分)もあります。ただしディティールの欠損したハイライト部分が大きく面積を占めるのは良くありません。
- 構図とは画像画面内での各要素の配置の事を言います。“三分割法”は構図作成には良い方法で、美術学校でも教えられています。まず、画像に水平線と垂直線をそれぞれ2本引き、画像を水平・垂直方向とも3分割します。主題を中央に配置するとたいていは画面に面白味を欠き、水平線と垂直線が交差する4つの交点の内どれか1つに主題を置いた方が良い画面になるでしょう。地平線は画面を半分に切ってしまうので、通常は地平線を中央に配置するべきではありません。上寄り、若しくは下寄りに配置させる方が良いでしょう。主たる考え方としては空間を上手に使い、躍動感・臨場感のある画面を作るという事です。
- 動感表現 - ここでは被写体の「動き」を表現する手法を紹介します。動きのある被写体は止まって見えるか、もしくはブレて写りますが、これらはどちらの方が良いとは必ずしも言えず、どのような表現意図を持っているかによります。「動感」は主題と共に写り込んでいる他の背景等との関係で表現されます。例えばレーシングカーの撮影。車と背景とが共に止まって見えては、見る側にスピード感は伝わってきません。 なので撮影手法によって車は画面内で止まっているように写り、かつ背景をブレさせることでスピード感が表現され、このような手法を「パンニング(流し撮り)」と呼びます。一方で、背景と共に止まって撮られた高く跳躍したバスケットボール選手は、これは決定的瞬間の「不自然」なポーズになり、これも良い写真になり得るでしょう。
- 被写界深度(DOF)とは主題の前側から後ろ側までのフォーカスエリアの事を言います。被写界深度は全ての画像で明解な意図のもと選択され、深い、または浅い被写界深度は、画像に品質を与えもし、また損なわせもします。浅い被写界深度は、主題を他の被写体から切り離し、見せたい被写体に注目を集めることが出来ます。深い被写界深度は空間を強調させる事が出来ます。広角(短焦点)レンズは深い被写界深度、逆に望遠(長焦点)レンズは浅い被写界深度が得られる傾向があります。また絞りを絞り込むと被写界深度は深く、解放すると浅い被写界深度が得られます。
グラフィック要素では形状、ボリューム、色、テクスチャー、遠近感、バランス、比率 等を見ます。
- 形状とは主題に対する輪郭線、及び形状を言います。
- ボリュームとは主題の立体感に対する品質を言います。立体感は横からのライティングで表現出来、反対に正面からのライティングは被写体を平坦に見せる傾向があり、不向きとされています。自然光の中でベストな光を得るには、早朝か、もしくは夕方の日の光が良いでしょう。
- 色は大変重要で、強すぎる色合いは好ましくありません。
- テクスチャーとは主題の表面材質の描写性に於ける品質を言います。表面材質は横からのライティングにより強調され、手に触れて伝わるかのような質感を与えます。
- 遠近感とは、画像の画面内若しくは外にある消失点で繋がる放射状の直線、これに沿った形で現れる「角度」により表現されます。
- バランスでは画像の画面内での重心が左右均衡か、若しくは片方に寄る等適切な配置が成されているかを見ます。
- 比率では画面の大きさに対する被写体の大きさを見ます。一般的に、小さな被写体は小さく写真に表現してしまう傾向にありますが、相応しい撮影手法により小さな被写体を実寸とは逆に大きく見せる事が可能です。例えば、小さな花を大きな山よりも大きく見る事が出来ます。この手法を指して「倒置法」と呼びます。
- 主題の全ての要素を画像に盛込む必要はありません。多くの写真はそれぞれの個性で評価出来ます。すなわち、画像の色やテクスチャー等々により判断出来ます。
- 『象徴性か妥当性か』 ー 『秀逸な画像』ではしばしばこのようなテーマで意見論争が起こる傾向にあります。技術的・品質的には出来の悪い写真でも極めて撮影困難な被写体を捉えた写真は、凡庸な被写体を写した品質的に良い写真よりも評価されます。もちろん撮影困難な被写体を写し、かつ品質も良い写真は極めて価値の高い写真と言えます。
- 画像は時に撮影者と評価者、若しくはどちらか片方の文化的な偏りが見られます。画像の意図は画像そのものの文化的背景により評価されるべきであり、評価者の文化的背景に依存してはいけません。イメージは人に語りかけ、そして慈しみ、怒り、拒絶、幸せ、悲しみ等の感情を喚起させる力を持っています。良い写真から与えられる心地よさには限りがありません。
画像のガイドラインを事前に読めば、あなたの推薦が成就する可能性を最大限に引き伸ばしてくれるでしょう。
新規推薦
[edit]推薦に値する価値があると考えられる画像を作った、または見つけたならば、その画像に適切な説明とライセンスが与えられているかを確認し、以下に従ってください。
ステップ1:画像名(接頭Image:を含む)を下のテキストボックス内の文字列の後にコピー&ペースト、正しく Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg と記入されているかを確認し、続いて『作品を推薦』ボタンをクリックします。
ステップ2:ページ編集画面上にある指示に従い必要箇所を付記、ページを保存してください。
ステップ3:ステップ2で作成したページへのリンクをFeatured picture candidates/candidate listへ手動で挿入します。ページ編集をクリックし、候補リスト最上部に以下の書式で推薦画像へのリンクを加えます。
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:推薦画像名.jpg}}
投票
[edit]投票には以下のテンプレートを使用します:
- {{支持}}または{{Support}} (
Support、
Support),
- {{反対}}または{{Oppose}} (
Oppose、
Oppose),
- {{中立}}または{{Neutral}} (
Neutral、
Neutral),
- {{コメント}}または{{Comment}} (
Comment、
Comment),
- 情報:{{Info}} (
Info),
- 質問:{{Question}} (
Question).
テンプレート{{FPX|理由}}を用いて、推薦画像が秀逸な画像の推薦に相応しくない旨を指摘出来ます。テンプレートの「理由」部分に、秀逸な画像には明確に値しない事の説明を書き加えます(可能ならば英語で)。
あなたが何故その画像を好むか、または好まないか、特に( Supportや(
Opposeの投票をする際は簡単な理由を加えましょう。また署名(~~~~)も忘れずに。匿名投票は受け付けられません。
秀逸な画像からの除外
[edit]時も経ればやがて『秀逸な画像』の基準も変わります。かつては“充分に価値に値する”と決定されたであろう画像も、その価値は普遍ではありません。ここでは「もはや『秀逸な画像』に値しない」と考えられる画像をリストアップします。リストされた画像へは、{{Keep}} Keep 及び {{維持}}
Keep (=『秀逸な画像』に値する)、または{{Delist}}
Delist 及び {{除外}}
Oppose (=『秀逸な画像』に値しない)を投票します。
あなたが『秀逸な画像』の価値基準に値しないと考える画像があれば、除外候補として提出できます。除外したい画像の画像名(接頭Image:を含む)を下のテキストボックスの文字列の後にコピー&ペーストします。
あなたが作成した新規除外候補のページに以下を加えます。
- 画像の作者、投稿者等の出所情報。
- その画像の“過去の秀逸な画像への推薦”ページへのリンク(画像ページの「リンク節」に表示されています)。
- あなたが除外と考える理由とあなたの署名。
次に、Commons:Featured picture candidates/removalを編集し、下記の書式で作成した除外候補のページのリンクを手動で最上段に挿入します。
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:除外画像名.jpg}}
秀逸な画像の候補での方針
[edit]総則
[edit]- 投票期間を終えた後、結果は推薦日時から数えて10日後(下記タイムテーブル参照)に決定します。投票期間は推薦日時から数えて9日と23時間59分です。10日、またはそれを超えた投票はカウントされません。
- 匿名寄稿者による推薦を歓迎します。
- 匿名寄稿者による議論への参加を歓迎します。
- 匿名寄稿者による投票はカウントされません。
- 推薦者票は投票へはカウントされません。支持は明示的かつ言明される必要があります。
- 推薦者は自身の推薦をいつでも取り下げる事が出来ます。推薦を取り下げるには "I withdraw my nomination" (推薦を取り下げます)と書くか、テンプレート
{{withdraw|~~~~}}
を加えます。 - ウィキメディア・コモンズのプロジェクトの目的は、全てのウィキメディアプロジェクト(将来的なプロジェクト含む)に於いて自由に利用可能な画像を集積するセントラル・データベースを提供することである、ということを忘れないでください。セントラル・データベースは単純にウィキメディアの保管庫と言うわけではなく、また『秀逸な画像』等のプロジェクトに応じた判断をされるべきではありません。
- 推薦日から数えて5日間支持を受けられなかった画像(推薦者票含まず)は候補リストから外されます。(下記タイムテーブル参照)
- テンプレート{{FPX}}が貼られた画像は、テンプレート{{FPX}}の適用後は推薦者以外の支持票が無い限り、48時間後に候補リストから外されます。
秀逸と除外のルール
[edit]候補画像は下記必要事項に準じて秀逸な画像に認定されます。
- 適切なライセンス情報が添付されている。
- 最低5票以上の支持票を得ている。
- 支持:反対比率が2:1 (賛成が3分の2の過半数)以上である。
- 2つの同様な画像での異なったバージョンは同時に『秀逸な画像』へは認定されず、より支持票の多かった一枚を認定します。
除外ルールでは、投票期間、及びリストから外される期間は秀逸ルールと同じ期間を取ります。除外候補提出後5日間で提出者以外の Delist (
Oppose)票が得られなかった候補は、5日間ルールが適用され、候補リストから外されます。
常連ユーザーが推薦・投票の完了方法に従って、推薦投票を閉じることがあります。終了方法に関してはCommons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finishedを参照。
何よりも礼儀を忘れずに
[edit]どうか、あなたが評価するその画像が「人の作品」であることを忘れないでください。「これはヒドイ」、「こんなのキライだ」と言ったような表現は避けましょう。もしあなたが『反対』に票を投じなければならないのなら、思いやりを忘れずに。また、あなたの話す英語は、また誰か他の人の話す英語とは同じではないでしょう。慎重に言葉を選んでください。
それでは良い評価を。そして、全てのルールは壊すことが出来るという事を忘れないでください。
関連項目
[edit]- 候補リストの編集はこちら:Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
- 日付順秀逸な画像リスト:Commons:Featured_pictures/chronological
- 秀逸な画像候補アーカイブ:Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log
- 推薦・投票の完了方法:Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished
- 基礎英語による写真・画像用語解説
- 秀逸な画像の候補リスト
- Photography critiques(画像評論)
- Help:スキャニング
目次
[edit]秀逸な画像の候補
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2025 at 07:54:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#France
Info Belcastel, one of the "most beautiful villages of France" (Les Plus Beaux Villages de France). Created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 07:54, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Support —kallerna (talk) 07:54, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 10:27, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2025 at 20:54:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Opisthocomidae (Hoatzin)
Info A very unusual bird, the only species in the Order. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:54, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:54, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good composition Cmao20 (talk) 01:48, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:44, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2025 at 21:01:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Psittacidae (True Parrots)
Info Two FPs of the subspecies in Honduras. This pair are visiting a mineral salt/clay lick in the Amazon. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:01, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:01, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice to have a shot in its 'context' like this. Cmao20 (talk) 01:47, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:41, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2025 at 20:38:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#United States
Info The entrance to an Amtrak Superliner II coach on the Auto Train from Lorton, Virginia to Sanford, Florida, at the Lorton station. Another flat-on composition. I haven't watched North by Northwest to see if there's a similar shot in the film - created by Acroterion – uploaded by Acroterion – nominated by Acroterion -- Acroterion (talk) 20:38, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 20:38, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Elegant composition Cmao20 (talk) 01:46, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:40, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 10:27, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2025 at 14:45:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Strigidae (True Owls)
Info A rare species of Indonesian owl, described as an elusive and little-known bird. IUCN rated 'Near threatened' as a consequence of small population and habitat loss. No FPs of this species. Whether this one is FP might depend on what you think of the blurry branch, but I'm fine with it, it helps frame the birds. I'll add that I can't find a better picture of this species on the internet, let alone a male-female pair under a Creative Commons license. created by JJ Harrison – uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support - Almost looks like a painting! I'm not the keenest on the vignetting, but this is certainly an excellent image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:40, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Hmmmm... The birds are awesome, but I'm not a fan of this sort of vignetting. It looks like a very ordinary version based on exposure and highlights. If you use a combo of shadows, dehaze and dark hues instead, such a vignetting would look more natural and not so intrusive. --Cart (talk) 16:10, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- I can understand this criticism. I made this nomination mainly because of the rarity of the photo and the good detail on an elusive species, but you do make a valid point. Let's see how votes go for now. Cmao20 (talk) 16:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Of course, you made the right choice to pick this one. For its medium fault, it is the best we have of the species. Unfortunately, Mr JJ is not known for taking part in discussions about his photos here on FPC or be open to changes or advice. Let the rest of the voters decide. --Cart (talk) 17:59, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- He's not been active since October last year, so I doubt he's going to show up (however, I wouldn't say that means we've lost him as a contributor, he's taken long breaks before). Cmao20 (talk) 19:27, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- John responds if you mail him directly. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- I can understand this criticism. I made this nomination mainly because of the rarity of the photo and the good detail on an elusive species, but you do make a valid point. Let's see how votes go for now. Cmao20 (talk) 16:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Quality is OK, even if not perfect, but rarity of this makes it FP. --Yann (talk) 18:21, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:08, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:38, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2025 at 14:45:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Croatia
Info 6th prize in WLM Croatia 2024, and in my opinion should have finished higher. One FP of this castle, angle is very different. created by Tournasol7 – uploaded by Tournasol7 – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support I love the light and editing in this! It's so much like a delicate drawing made with dip pen and aquarelle (example). The angle gives you a lot of interesting shadows and hues; you just want to explore the photo. --Cart (talk) 16:23, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:49, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support A well-chosen three-quarter view of the castle; I personally like it much better than the FP of the frontal view. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:49, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:10, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:36, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2025 at 09:36:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Canada
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:36, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:36, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support A minimalist composition emphasizing geometry, symmetry, and muted tones. The reduced visual language reflects a deliberate and precise photographic approach. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:28, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice minimalism! And once again you are showing off your incredible white-on-white photo skills. --Cart (talk) 12:18, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cart. Cmao20 (talk) 14:24, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:40, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin and Cart --Kritzolina (talk) 17:48, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:35, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2025 at 23:44:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Golden Gate Bridge, San Francisco
Info created by Sebring12Hrs – uploaded by Sebring12Hrs – nominated by Sebring12Hrs -- Sebring12Hrs (talk) 23:44, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Sebring12Hrs (talk) 23:44, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Weak support It's hard to muster enthusiasm for the most photographed bridge we have here at FPC, but this brings a new gritty perspective. Quality is good for such an old photo. The file description and categories were a bare minimum, please do better with these in the future. I've fixed both for you now. --Cart (talk) 12:37, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Yes of course ! Thanks for your work on the description and your vote. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:01, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support A fresh perspective of a common subject. Worth a star IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 14:24, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support - Very different than my usual image of the Gate. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:41, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:33, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2025 at 16:11:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Weather#Sun
Info created and uploaded by Sri Chakra Pranav – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 16:11, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 16:11, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but this is a bit too generic per the Value section: "almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing". An almost minimalistic photo like this with lines as the main feature, must be perfectly composed and that means ending lines in corners and not cutting of triangle corners. A few steps to the left here would have made this so much more interesting. --Cart (talk) 16:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Its a sunrise from above the clouds, I don't think that's quite generic tbh. I, for one, have yet to see one myself. :) UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:03, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support For me there's something magical about it. I enjoy the minimalism and find the 'landscape of clouds' quite pleasant to look at. Cmao20 (talk) 20:39, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support: the cloud layer does it for me. Are those birds or is it just dust in the top-left? JayCubby (talk) 00:58, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment It is difficult to get a sense of scale, though it seems that there is a person (blurry) in top left on the hill. - ERcheck (talk) 03:24, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- There are two (possibly three) people, actually. All on left side: one in the distance, with back to camera, one a bit closer, behind grass and facing the camera. A third possible person is the dark blob, though it could also be a rock. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 03:33, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I am amazed by this nomination. I can't see any sharpness here. The foreground is completly blurred and noisy. Not even a QI. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:51, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2025 at 13:46:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Significantly digitally altered images
Info So I've played nice for a while here, which means it's time for an odd/outrageous/non-conforming nomination. Like I sometimes do, I like to introduce photography styles that have not yet made their way to FPC. This time it's Cinematic style photography, which means that the light, colors and composition are edited in a way that makes it look like a still from a movie. Sometimes these photos are edited to emulate the style of a specific movie (Blade runner, The Matrix or any movies that contain rainy neon lights in Tokyo, etc. are popular) or the work of a director (like the "Accidentally Wes Anderson" we have in another nom). My nom here is using the orange-blue "light doping" that is so popular in say crime or action movies, to transform an ordinary aisle at IKEA into a place where it looks like you might expect a fight to take place. :) Probably a nom that will go down in flames, but it's fun to make these photos once in a while.
- Self-serve aisle with pallet racking shelves in IKEA store in Torp köpcentrum, Uddevalla, Sweden, edited in cinematic style using normal functions in Lightroom. No "ready-made" filters or settings used. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 13:46, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cart (talk) 13:46, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support I definitely appreciatie your experiments - and this one is an excellent one! --Kritzolina (talk) 17:43, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 19:05, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- If I may make a comment in between. Thank you, Cart, I really appreciate it when people here sometimes deviate from the rather sober line (not meant in a derogatory way). It's not easy to present a different style, but it's good because it also encourages and establishes creativity. Admittedly, it is a tightrope walk, because photo editing can quickly appear too artificial. Your photo here is a very good way of not looking too artificial, but presenting an impressive photo. --XRay 💬 07:43, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Cool idea, and yes, I immediately thought of Blade Runner. Cmao20 (talk) 20:38, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Cinematically edited, evoking the tight, claustrophobic corridors of the spaceships in the Alien movies. A powerful, atmospheric image that transforms the ordinary into something striking. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:34, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment - When I first looked at the image, before reading Cart's description, my first thought was of Raiders of the Lost Ark warehouse. Smiled when I read "emulating the style of a specific movie". While the style is not the same, the feeling is. - ERcheck (talk) 03:33, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- That classic scene is hard not to have somewhere in the back of your head when you're editing a photo of a warehouse. :-) --Cart (talk) 03:37, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Btw, I was "going to the mattresses" down right in the photo. Extra points if you get that movie reference. --Cart (talk) 03:44, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Btw, I was "going to the mattresses" down right in the photo. Extra points if you get that movie reference. --Cart (talk) 03:44, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- That classic scene is hard not to have somewhere in the back of your head when you're editing a photo of a warehouse. :-) --Cart (talk) 03:37, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Movie references (spoiler) |
---|
:My first thought was You've Got Mail (I can hear Meg Ryan's voice), which of course was referring to The Godfather.- ERcheck (talk) 05:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC) — That earns you one point for the quote film, another one for the film quoting the quote, and finally one point for answering this in a stylish way. --Cart (talk) 12:11, 8 June 2025 (UTC) |
Support - For evoking immediate memories of classic films. Pushing the envelope. - ERcheck (talk) 13:34, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:42, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support. There's a hair of
chromatic aberration. Great photo! JayCubby (talk) 16:22, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Probably, but with all that extra color and light, I think that hair just adds to the flavor of this soup. ;) --Cart (talk) 16:25, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- I thought that it may have been left for a reason. JayCubby (talk) 02:55, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
- Probably, but with all that extra color and light, I think that hair just adds to the flavor of this soup. ;) --Cart (talk) 16:25, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:29, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2025 at 06:40:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 06:40, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Info Madonna on the crescent at the entrance of the Essener Cathedral Treasury, around 1500 Oak wood, polychrome. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:40, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 06:40, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 08:58, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support I like this one a lot better than the last one. The angle of the sculpture is a lot more flattering to it. Cmao20 (talk) 20:37, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:14, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- E.IMANCOMMONS 22:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:42, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:28, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2025 at 20:59:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Eclipse
Info created by KPNO/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/P. Horálek (Institute of Physics in Opava) – uploaded by Felipehernandez1193 – nominated by 3df -- 3df (talk) 20:59, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support I noticed that the eclipses section looked a little light on featured pictures, and I remember being blown away by this star trail (long exposure) picture of a total lunar eclipse behind an observatory. -- 3df (talk) 20:59, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Some of the eclipses are composites and montages, and are therefore kept in the Composites and Montages gallery. --Cart (talk) 21:08, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but the fisheye projection doesn't really work for me, it makes the effect look exaggerated and less interesting Cmao20 (talk) 23:27, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Long star trails and making a light trail out of an eclipse is an awesome idea, but adding a fisheye distortion to that is one Special Effects too much. Just because you have all these gadgets, doesn't mean you need to use them all at once; that makes for messy photos. --Cart (talk) 12:33, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Optical engineers spend their careers making lenses with minimal distortion, and the Institute just... adds distortion? JayCubby (talk) 01:09, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Lenguado común (Solea solea), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2023-07-27, DD 28.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2025 at 19:41:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Soleidae (True Soles)
Info created and uploaded by Poco a poco, nominated by Yann
Info Common sole (Solea solea), Arrábida National Park, Portugal. It lives on the sandy or muddy seabed of the northern Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea where it often partially immerses itself in the substrate. The small eyes are close to each other on the right side of the body. This gives the fish the possibility of lurking half-buried in the sand for passing prey. The common sole, just like all other flatfishes, hatches as an "ordinary" fish with one eye on each side of the body. The young metamorphose to flatfish begins when they are about one centimeter long. It grows to a maximum length of about 70 centimetres (28 in).
Support Another great Poco's image. -- Yann (talk) 19:41, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the nom, Yann! I do like it, indeed :) Poco a poco (talk) 19:46, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice photo. But I will note that we have two FPs of this species. I think this one is sufficiently different that it can be FP, but I think reviewers shouldb be aware of the others Cmao20 (talk)
- Yes. I think this one is more interesting, as it shows the whole fish, not only the head. And in the other one, the fish is buried in the sand. Yann (talk) 09:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:10, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Acroterion (talk) 14:39, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:37, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:43, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2025 at 14:25:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info created by Gzen92 – uploaded by Gzen92 – nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 14:25, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 14:25, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Satisfying and rewarding composition. I'll admit that the level of detail at full size is not quite where I'd want it to be but I can forgive it for a 24 megapixel file when it's composed so nicely. Cmao20 (talk) 23:24, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support nice motif and composition. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:42, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Regretful oppose Sorry, composition and motif are great, that is a very impressing wisteria, but the Dark ContoursTM that so many phones produce are not FP quality for me. I know that more and more voters are beginning to accept these quirks that phones have, probably worn down by seeing them so often and referring to big files, but for me they are not advancing the quality in photos. --Cart (talk) 12:04, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- You're right, unfortunately I didn't have my camera that day. Gzen92 (talk) 19:35, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Weak
Oppose as this is a good image. Just not the best lighting (a little too dark) and per Cart, not enough wow for me. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:42, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:37, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2025 at 11:13:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Fagales#Family : Fagaceae
Info created by StVeit Maps – uploaded by StVeit Maps – nominated by StVeit Maps -- StVeit Maps (talk) 11:13, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- StVeit Maps (talk) 11:13, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose The quality is very good, the framing is perfect, the back-light is making the leaves beautiful, there is a path I want to walk on - I would like to have it as a large print on my wall, just to dream... And then the whole thing is ruined by a big sign with a QR code. Sorry, --Cart (talk) 13:30, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support per everything Cart said - except the thing about the sign. I believe in pictures that show reality as it is. And most such spots nowadays have some kind of signage. Also this is very fitting for a picture in an encyclopedic porject. --Kritzolina (talk) 17:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Due to the CA in the leaves and the blown out highlights as well as the sign and the cable car wires, this is not a FP for me. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 19:14, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support The QR code on the sign doesn't bother me at all. It just is what it is. If anything I quite like that someone in some conservation department put up a sign so that curious people can find out more about their surroundings. The composition is lovely and so is the light. A flaw is that the highlights have been lowered too much in an attempt to recover detail that isn't there, meaning that what ought to be bright white is a dull grey. Cmao20 (talk) 23:23, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice scene at small size, but not unusual, and lacking in detail due to harsh lighting. --Tagooty (talk) 10:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20 --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:48, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Weak support It would be nice to remove CA. I like the light and the place. --Rbrechko (talk) 15:03, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Tagooty. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:37, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support: sign could be removed, but I don't see much wrong with having it around. JayCubby (talk) 16:28, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2025 at 10:20:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1960-1969
Info created by Walt Cisco, uploaded by JayCubby, nominated by Yann
Support Historical image with high value, good quality, high resolution. -- Yann (talk) 10:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support. Thanks for the nomination. JayCubby (talk) 11:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support as per nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:27, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Obviously. --Cart (talk) 13:34, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 14:06, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support - ERcheck (talk) 20:32, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Always makes me sad Cmao20 (talk) 23:21, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Felino Volador (talk) 21:27, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- E.IMANCOMMONS 22:25, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Goes without saying. – Aristeas (talk) 10:06, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2025 at 21:46:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info Shrimp and crayfish boat LL-25 MiTina turning into her home harbor in Norra Grundsund, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden.
- Standing on the jetty taking photos, I noticed the boat was approaching the harbor a bit faster than I thought it might, also taking the turn into the harbor a bit sharper than it should throwing up a good bow wave and backwash. After it had moored I jokingly commented on this to the captain. He said that he saw me on the jetty with my camera and was showing off to give me a good photo. :) After editing the photo, I sent a copy of it to the boat's internet page and gave them the rights to use it as they pleased. I figured, "one good turn deserves another". They still use this photo on social media and other things. :) All by me, -- Cart (talk) 21:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cart (talk) 21:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Very dynamic. Nice. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:13, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice action shot. —Bruce1eetalk 07:21, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:02, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:24, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Frank; and I like the pastel-colored sky. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:35, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support: follows rule of thirds, the horizon is straight, and the dynamic range is excellent. JayCubby (talk) 12:55, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Kudos to the captain and you --Kritzolina (talk) 17:58, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Dynamic composition, good quality, likeable captain. – Aristeas (talk) 19:21, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas and JayCubby. Clear FP Cmao20 (talk) 23:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Nice photo with high quality but the composition does not convince me completey. Looking at the driving direction of the ship it should be placed much more to the right (at 2/3 from the left and not at 1/3 as you've choosen - for me it looks a bit unbalanced. Otherwise the color contrast between ship/water to the rock in the background is nice and also the traces on the water. Thus: too good to oppose :) --Tuxyso (talk) 06:59, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Using Lead room is what we usually do/need for photos of vehicles, but that doesn't apply for action shots of moving objects where we have something behind whatever is moving to indicate speed and direction. It's the same for boats, ships, airplanes, rockets or tractors. Take a look at a mockup of this MiTina photo, and how it would look with your 2/3 placing. The boat still looks nice, but it slows the boat down considerably and cuts off the interesting backwash and trail in the sea. It's a good shot of a boat, but not an action shot. To indicate speed in a photo, we like to see the mess left behind the vehicle as it appears to burst out from the frame. --Cart (talk) 11:35, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Nicely done. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 19:06, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2025 at 12:59:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
Info Looking eastward at Dhavani village in the warm evening light. Located in the Nilgiri mountains of South India. Note: There are no FPs of settlements in India south of the Himalayas. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 12:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 12:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support The cluster of village buildings pops out of the exapnse of fields of varying shades of green. The evening colours in the sky elevate the image. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:16, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support and I hope no one complains about the noise - this is a 41 megapixel image under low light conditions and we should be grateful to the nominator for uploading in full size rather than complaining about a bit of noise and adding noise reduction to ruin all the nice details. Cmao20 (talk) 23:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Quality does not convince me. If the light conditions are not good enough for a hand-held shot, just take a tripod. The photo also has remarkable border unsharpness - extermely visible at the left side. Regarding noise: Even if it's a 41 MP photo, that doesn't stop anyone from applying a proper noise reduction technique to a RAW image - for example the AI-based NR in Lightroom. All in all: For me not enough effort is done here to make the photo an FP. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:06, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Done @Tuxyso: I have applied NR to the sky and the distant hills on the left. Also, cropped a small strip on the left to remove the unsharp tree etc. Hope this is better. --Tagooty (talk) 10:06, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your effort, Tagooty. The noise on the sky is now much better managed. But for the noise level on the detail areas is (the trees, the buildings) is still too high. If you have the possibility I suggest to give the very good AI-based NR-technique of LR a try. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:56, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I'm sorry, while it is a good documentary photo and a worthy VI, it doesn't give me that wow-feeling I expect from an FP. The best thing this photo has going for it is the display of the Belt of Venus and now with the cut, some of that is gone. The general light is flat and makes the buildings look glary. As is often with a subject divided into two parts, leaving a void in the middle, I think it would have been better to make the framing around the left part of the village and the pink glow in the background. Take in too much and you often lose the image. (crop suggestion for an 'Alt'? It's big enough for this.) --Cart (talk) 12:49, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:36, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2025 at 12:22:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Canada
Info all by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:22, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:22, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Maybe a bit low wow, but pretty and nicely photographed Cmao20 (talk) 23:18, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2025 at 01:11:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Ornaments
Info Terra cotta sculptures at the entrance to the Brooklyn Historical Society building, New York City - created by Acroterion – uploaded by Acroterion – nominated by Acroterion -- Acroterion (talk) 01:11, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 01:11, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Cool, do you know if the sculpture is supposed to be anyone in particular? Cmao20 (talk) 01:15, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- According to this [1] the sculptures at the doorway are just idealized figures - the one on the other side is a Viking (!). Other terra cotta sculptures on the building were of historical figures. All of them were executed by Olin Levi Warner in 1881. I'll add some of that to the description. Acroterion (talk) 01:33, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good focus on a detail of the façade that most people just overlook otherwise. --Cart (talk) 11:34, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 17:20, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Well done. I can't figure out why, but the picture instantly catches the eye. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:03, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:12, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:58, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:26, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Ekaterina. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:30, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cart & Екатерина Борисова. -- Terragio67 (talk) 18:34, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cart and Екатерина Борисова. – Aristeas (talk) 19:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Felino Volador (talk) 21:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Borracho mono (Ophioblennius steindachneri), Cabo San Lucas, Baja California, México, 2024-12-18, DD 80.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2025 at 19:33:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Blenniidae (Combtooth Blennies)
Info Large-banded blenny (Ophioblennius steindachneri), Cabo San Lucas, Baja California, Mexico. It's found in coral reefs in the eastern Pacific ocean. This species reaches a length of 18 centimetres (7.1 in). They are territorial and feed during the day when they graze on algae and prey on sessile invertebrates by using the incisor teeth, which are similar in shape to combs, to scrape food off the rock. Note: we have no FPs of this species and only one of the genus Ophioblennius. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:33, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:33, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Osmo Lundell hey 23:01, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent composition and sharpness, good separation from the background Cmao20 (talk) 00:38, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 11:36, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:23, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good composition and detail in this underwater image. --Tagooty (talk) 13:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:56, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20 & Tagooty. – Terragio67 (talk) 10:23, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:27, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2025 at 15:43:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:43, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:43, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment - Trees on the side are distracting. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Sorry, pretty waterfall but not an outstanding composition for me Cmao20 (talk) 23:18, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Maybe I would prefer to use another crop, but anyway nice picture. --Rbrechko (talk) 14:56, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 18:17, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2025 at 15:41:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:41, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:41, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment This is a very nice little waterfall. However, I think you shouldn't be afraid to keep some of the shadows and black hues in the image. In this I've made a few tweaks to the exposure, reduced saturation and luminosity a bit, deepening some shadows, adjusted white balance a couple of clicks and tweaked the highlights. For me that gives the photo a more "3D look". Use it if you like or take some pointers from it. Best, --Cart (talk) 14:09, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment A nice waterfall and I appreciate that you used a realistic exposure time and not the omnipresent very long “waterfall exposure”. IMHO Cart’s version looks more realistic and up to life, therefore I would recommend to give it a try … – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 23:20:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1950-1959
Info restored and uploaded by JayCubby – nominated by JayCubby -- JayCubby (talk) 23:20, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Not the highest resolution (at 2500 px square), but an emotionally charged photograph -- JayCubby (talk) 23:20, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you Cart for the gallery fix. JayCubby (talk) 23:51, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- @ERcheck, though you removed your !vote, you still provided valuable feedback. Perhaps File:Emmett Till's funeral - mourners (restored) (test crop).jpg would be a better composition. JayCubby (talk) 03:50, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Though images may be cropped for articles, we usually prefer to feature historical photos uncropped as they are, only cropping away borders if they are not part of the presentation of the photo. --Cart (talk) 05:31, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Cart - I understand, and, in principle, agree with the reasons for leaving an historical photo uncropped. - ERcheck (talk) 05:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- I think the crop with the head cloned out would be better. Yann (talk) 17:39, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Yann,
Done, still at File:Emmett Till's funeral - mourners (restored) (test crop).jpg. JayCubby (talk) 20:17, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- @JayCubby - That crop works well. - ERcheck (talk) 21:23, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Yann,
- Though images may be cropped for articles, we usually prefer to feature historical photos uncropped as they are, only cropping away borders if they are not part of the presentation of the photo. --Cart (talk) 05:31, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- @JayCubby - I did remove my vote as I ponder this a bit more. I experimented with cropping the photo and found it to be much more evocative, though found it difficult to get it "just right". I tried the crop on the left to just enough to remove nearest gentleman's face, leaving the full expression of the other man; and, a crop from the right to remove the sliver of the person next to the woman with her arm raised. But, per Cart, I'm wary of advocating for that change. - ERcheck (talk) 05:39, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:16, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 05:44, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Been thinking about this for a long time now, and it is a very moving photo of very good quality taken at what must have been a rather chaotic event. It's a document of an historic event that I think should be preserved and featured in its entirety, after that people can use it as a base for other crops. Sure, we featured Heroico instead of the original, but that was mostly because the cropped version is the best one known and mostly used. I don't see any similar precedence with this. --Cart (talk) 12:03, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment - The above version is itself cropped. On EmmettTillExhibit.org, which was created in partnership with the Till family, The Emmett Till & Mamie Till-Mobley Institute, the Emmett Till Interpretive Center, and The Children's Museum of Indianapolis, see Image 16. In that "original" photo, Till's grandfather is also in the photo. As such, if one accepts a crop from the right, accepting a crop from the left (which is actually not taking out key people), would seem acceptable. - ERcheck (talk) 15:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Now the problem with that is that the full photo, probably from the original negative, is apparently owned some foundation or museum, so we are not sure that one is free to use and can probably not get our hands on it. The cropped photo above on the other hand, is from a paper copy owned by the Smithsonian and we know it is free. This is why so few old iconic photos get promoted. There are often many versions of them floating around and people here are forever quarrelling about which version to promote. (I can't remember how many attempts were made for different versions of Heroico for years.) I still say I vote to promote the whole photo we have and know is free, and let other crops be made from it, instead of mucking things up further. --Cart (talk) 17:04, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- I full-heartedly agree with Cart here! Kritzolina (talk) 17:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Now the problem with that is that the full photo, probably from the original negative, is apparently owned some foundation or museum, so we are not sure that one is free to use and can probably not get our hands on it. The cropped photo above on the other hand, is from a paper copy owned by the Smithsonian and we know it is free. This is why so few old iconic photos get promoted. There are often many versions of them floating around and people here are forever quarrelling about which version to promote. (I can't remember how many attempts were made for different versions of Heroico for years.) I still say I vote to promote the whole photo we have and know is free, and let other crops be made from it, instead of mucking things up further. --Cart (talk) 17:04, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mero chino (Cirrhitus rivulatus), Cabo San Lucas, Baja California, México, 2024-12-18, DD 01.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 20:45:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Cirrhitidae (Hawkfishes)
Info Portrait of a giant hawkfish (Cirrhitus rivulatus), Cabo San Lucas, Baja California, Mexico. This marine fish is found in the eastearn Pacific Ocean and is the largest of the hawkfish family with maximum size of 60 cm (24 in) in total length. Note: we have no FPs of the genus Cirrhitus. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Amazing capture! Cmao20 (talk) 23:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Exceptional clarity in the patterns --Tagooty (talk) 15:27, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:54, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:20, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:37, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:47, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:28, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 19:18:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
Info Small-scale lobster fishing boat Idunn in Björholmen fishing village on the Swedish island Tjörn. The boat is mostly used for Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) fishing. One of the few remaining fishing boats on the island which was once a significant center for fishing. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 19:18, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 19:18, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:12, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Good shot and nice detail but not an extraordinary subject / compo / lighting that would make it one of our finest shots Poco a poco (talk) 20:29, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:54, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 19:00:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Events
Info created and uploaded by Afsalgado – nominated by Kritzolina - another wonderful and really different find from WLF. This one is from a carnival in Portugal. -- Kritzolina (talk) 19:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Every time I look at this image I feel another jolt of positive surprise. The energy that is captured in this shot ist amazing. -- Kritzolina (talk) 19:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:16, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment Sorry, I'm not so keen on this, and after having had a look at the tasteful color photos from the same event, it feels like we are a bit short-changed by this B&W. Perhaps the author has a color version of this to upload? --Cart (talk) 22:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Cart, like you I also had a look at the other pictures in the category before nominating this one. But for me the resulting feeling was different - I felt reassured that the choice of B&W for this one was right. While the colors do well for most of the other motives (and yes, there are really good other shots in this category), this scene still works extremely well in B&W for me. I would like to hear opinions of others on this. Kritzolina (talk) 05:39, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Sure thing! I didn't cast a vote since I don't want to stand in the way for people who really like this B&W version, but I wanted to ask. --Cart (talk) 05:53, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Cart, like you I also had a look at the other pictures in the category before nominating this one. But for me the resulting feeling was different - I felt reassured that the choice of B&W for this one was right. While the colors do well for most of the other motives (and yes, there are really good other shots in this category), this scene still works extremely well in B&W for me. I would like to hear opinions of others on this. Kritzolina (talk) 05:39, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support I love it. IMHO black and white is great here because it gives the image a timeless and magical effect – could be a scene from some fantasy novel or Middle Ages movie. Works perfectly with the century-old stone walls and houses. One of my absolute favorites after browsing > 7000 images for the international WLF jury. – Aristeas (talk) 07:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Aristeas! Well, apart from browsing 7000+ WLF images, which I didn't do, kudos for the hard work :) --Julesvernex2 (talk) 18:50, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:53, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:36, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support It's really special! -- Radomianin (talk) 09:33, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose black/white does not convince be for a photo showing carneval. At the first glance I though the photo is a scan from a 50 year old camera. Taking into consideration that a state-of-the-art camera (Fuji X-T5) was used here the quality is only average and does not reach the FP bar here. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:54, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2025 at 04:57:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Genus : Halcyon
Info created & uploaded by Amarchobiabhi – nominated by ROCKY -- ROCKY (talk) 04:57, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- ROCKY (talk) 04:57, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 09:20, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Superb action shot, lovely colours and composition, could be POTY. --Tagooty (talk) 11:24, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment I may risk being uncharitable here but I struggle to understand how this picture, which is almost completely lacking in detail at full size, gets rave reviews from you whereas my nomination gets an oppose vote for 'lack of detail'. Cmao20 (talk) 00:03, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Kingfishers are great subjects. Acroterion (talk) 12:41, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- The comments below are valid criticisms, thank you for highlighting them. They should also be curable to enhance the image to FP expectations both technically and aesthetically. ROCKY, is it possible to induce the uploader to upload a less-aggressively-processed version? They appear to have been active in March. Acroterion (talk) 17:06, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose A beautiful and difficult shot, regrettably ruined by excessive sharpening and noise reduction --Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Sadly, I have to agree with Julesvernex2. It's unfortunate that excessive sharpening and denoising have resulted in a washed-out and overly uniform look – many details appear lost. With more careful post-processing, especially when using AI-based tools, significantly better results are possible. Perhaps the nominator could kindly ask the author via e-mail whether a new development from the Raw file might be feasible? Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 15:14, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose per Jules and Radomianin, so sorry. It always makes me sad when I see that people have great skills and make every effort to achieve wonderful photos, but then damage these images by rash post-processing so that they look like smartphone shots. This is such a stunning photo, it has deserved much better post-processing. Nerd hint: the pattern in some of the OOF drops of water at the top may be caused by the Phase Fresnel (PF) lens element; this is an additional reason why this photo needs careful editing – one should not emphasize that pattern by sharpening.– Aristeas (talk) 16:26, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, good point! This review warns about the risk of getting "Fresnel bokeh" on specular highlights, indeed one more reason to be careful when editing this image Julesvernex2 (talk) 10:02, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Julesvernex2 is right, great capture but very poor quality and overprocessed at full size Cmao20 (talk) 23:58, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2025 at 05:50:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Kritzolina. When I recently visited Prague, I was fascinated by the structures the motion of this sculpture created, especially the colored reflections on its moving pieces in front of the background of utalitarian office buildings. I took several shots of it, this one captures best what I really like about this artwork. -- Kritzolina (talk) 05:50, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kritzolina (talk) 05:50, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Very beautiful and carefully composed. Cmao20 (talk) 11:01, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I find the sculpture of the head pretty coold and FP-worthy but this picture is cluttered. I recognize no head here. Poco a poco (talk) 11:31, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice close-up of this kinetic (as in constantly moving) sculpture. For those who have not read Kafka, this transforming work is a nod to his most famous book, The Metamorphosis, where one morning, ordinary salesman Gregor Samsa wakes up to find himself transformed into a giant cockroach. No normal human head needs to be visible, Kafka was a pretty warped guy. --Cart (talk) 12:24, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Don't forget that Kafka was also a pretty funny guy and we know that he laughed at his own writings [2]. I really like that about him. Kritzolina (talk) 05:59, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Support The photo artfully captures the abstract quality of the sculpture. The dynamic movement and vibrant color reflections contrast vividly with the adjacent facade. The result is an eye-catching interplay between the kinetic sculpture detail and the urban architecture. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:44, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Most unusual. Photographing shiny objects is difficult, and it is well done here. Yann (talk) 16:06, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Support The photos perfectly shows how the complex surface of the sculpture reflects and distorts the reality around in countless facets; just like Kafka’s work, while it may appear fantastic at the first glance, reflects the countless facets of human society. – Aristeas (talk) 18:53, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 09:20, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:14, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 11:18, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:13, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:00, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
秀逸除外候補
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2025 at 07:54:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#France
Info Belcastel, one of the "most beautiful villages of France" (Les Plus Beaux Villages de France). Created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 07:54, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Support —kallerna (talk) 07:54, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 10:27, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2025 at 20:54:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Opisthocomidae (Hoatzin)
Info A very unusual bird, the only species in the Order. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:54, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:54, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good composition Cmao20 (talk) 01:48, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:44, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2025 at 21:01:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Psittacidae (True Parrots)
Info Two FPs of the subspecies in Honduras. This pair are visiting a mineral salt/clay lick in the Amazon. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:01, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:01, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice to have a shot in its 'context' like this. Cmao20 (talk) 01:47, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:41, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2025 at 20:38:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#United States
Info The entrance to an Amtrak Superliner II coach on the Auto Train from Lorton, Virginia to Sanford, Florida, at the Lorton station. Another flat-on composition. I haven't watched North by Northwest to see if there's a similar shot in the film - created by Acroterion – uploaded by Acroterion – nominated by Acroterion -- Acroterion (talk) 20:38, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 20:38, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Elegant composition Cmao20 (talk) 01:46, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:40, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 10:27, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2025 at 14:45:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Strigidae (True Owls)
Info A rare species of Indonesian owl, described as an elusive and little-known bird. IUCN rated 'Near threatened' as a consequence of small population and habitat loss. No FPs of this species. Whether this one is FP might depend on what you think of the blurry branch, but I'm fine with it, it helps frame the birds. I'll add that I can't find a better picture of this species on the internet, let alone a male-female pair under a Creative Commons license. created by JJ Harrison – uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support - Almost looks like a painting! I'm not the keenest on the vignetting, but this is certainly an excellent image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:40, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Hmmmm... The birds are awesome, but I'm not a fan of this sort of vignetting. It looks like a very ordinary version based on exposure and highlights. If you use a combo of shadows, dehaze and dark hues instead, such a vignetting would look more natural and not so intrusive. --Cart (talk) 16:10, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- I can understand this criticism. I made this nomination mainly because of the rarity of the photo and the good detail on an elusive species, but you do make a valid point. Let's see how votes go for now. Cmao20 (talk) 16:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Of course, you made the right choice to pick this one. For its medium fault, it is the best we have of the species. Unfortunately, Mr JJ is not known for taking part in discussions about his photos here on FPC or be open to changes or advice. Let the rest of the voters decide. --Cart (talk) 17:59, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- He's not been active since October last year, so I doubt he's going to show up (however, I wouldn't say that means we've lost him as a contributor, he's taken long breaks before). Cmao20 (talk) 19:27, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- John responds if you mail him directly. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- I can understand this criticism. I made this nomination mainly because of the rarity of the photo and the good detail on an elusive species, but you do make a valid point. Let's see how votes go for now. Cmao20 (talk) 16:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Quality is OK, even if not perfect, but rarity of this makes it FP. --Yann (talk) 18:21, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:08, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:38, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2025 at 14:45:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Croatia
Info 6th prize in WLM Croatia 2024, and in my opinion should have finished higher. One FP of this castle, angle is very different. created by Tournasol7 – uploaded by Tournasol7 – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support I love the light and editing in this! It's so much like a delicate drawing made with dip pen and aquarelle (example). The angle gives you a lot of interesting shadows and hues; you just want to explore the photo. --Cart (talk) 16:23, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:49, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support A well-chosen three-quarter view of the castle; I personally like it much better than the FP of the frontal view. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:49, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:10, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:36, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2025 at 09:36:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Canada
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:36, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:36, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support A minimalist composition emphasizing geometry, symmetry, and muted tones. The reduced visual language reflects a deliberate and precise photographic approach. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:28, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice minimalism! And once again you are showing off your incredible white-on-white photo skills. --Cart (talk) 12:18, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cart. Cmao20 (talk) 14:24, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:40, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin and Cart --Kritzolina (talk) 17:48, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:35, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2025 at 23:44:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Golden Gate Bridge, San Francisco
Info created by Sebring12Hrs – uploaded by Sebring12Hrs – nominated by Sebring12Hrs -- Sebring12Hrs (talk) 23:44, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Sebring12Hrs (talk) 23:44, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Weak support It's hard to muster enthusiasm for the most photographed bridge we have here at FPC, but this brings a new gritty perspective. Quality is good for such an old photo. The file description and categories were a bare minimum, please do better with these in the future. I've fixed both for you now. --Cart (talk) 12:37, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Yes of course ! Thanks for your work on the description and your vote. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:01, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support A fresh perspective of a common subject. Worth a star IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 14:24, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support - Very different than my usual image of the Gate. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:41, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:33, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2025 at 16:11:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Weather#Sun
Info created and uploaded by Sri Chakra Pranav – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 16:11, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 16:11, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but this is a bit too generic per the Value section: "almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing". An almost minimalistic photo like this with lines as the main feature, must be perfectly composed and that means ending lines in corners and not cutting of triangle corners. A few steps to the left here would have made this so much more interesting. --Cart (talk) 16:23, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Its a sunrise from above the clouds, I don't think that's quite generic tbh. I, for one, have yet to see one myself. :) UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:03, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support For me there's something magical about it. I enjoy the minimalism and find the 'landscape of clouds' quite pleasant to look at. Cmao20 (talk) 20:39, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support: the cloud layer does it for me. Are those birds or is it just dust in the top-left? JayCubby (talk) 00:58, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment It is difficult to get a sense of scale, though it seems that there is a person (blurry) in top left on the hill. - ERcheck (talk) 03:24, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- There are two (possibly three) people, actually. All on left side: one in the distance, with back to camera, one a bit closer, behind grass and facing the camera. A third possible person is the dark blob, though it could also be a rock. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 03:33, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I am amazed by this nomination. I can't see any sharpness here. The foreground is completly blurred and noisy. Not even a QI. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:51, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2025 at 13:46:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Significantly digitally altered images
Info So I've played nice for a while here, which means it's time for an odd/outrageous/non-conforming nomination. Like I sometimes do, I like to introduce photography styles that have not yet made their way to FPC. This time it's Cinematic style photography, which means that the light, colors and composition are edited in a way that makes it look like a still from a movie. Sometimes these photos are edited to emulate the style of a specific movie (Blade runner, The Matrix or any movies that contain rainy neon lights in Tokyo, etc. are popular) or the work of a director (like the "Accidentally Wes Anderson" we have in another nom). My nom here is using the orange-blue "light doping" that is so popular in say crime or action movies, to transform an ordinary aisle at IKEA into a place where it looks like you might expect a fight to take place. :) Probably a nom that will go down in flames, but it's fun to make these photos once in a while.
- Self-serve aisle with pallet racking shelves in IKEA store in Torp köpcentrum, Uddevalla, Sweden, edited in cinematic style using normal functions in Lightroom. No "ready-made" filters or settings used. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 13:46, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cart (talk) 13:46, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support I definitely appreciatie your experiments - and this one is an excellent one! --Kritzolina (talk) 17:43, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 19:05, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- If I may make a comment in between. Thank you, Cart, I really appreciate it when people here sometimes deviate from the rather sober line (not meant in a derogatory way). It's not easy to present a different style, but it's good because it also encourages and establishes creativity. Admittedly, it is a tightrope walk, because photo editing can quickly appear too artificial. Your photo here is a very good way of not looking too artificial, but presenting an impressive photo. --XRay 💬 07:43, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Cool idea, and yes, I immediately thought of Blade Runner. Cmao20 (talk) 20:38, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Cinematically edited, evoking the tight, claustrophobic corridors of the spaceships in the Alien movies. A powerful, atmospheric image that transforms the ordinary into something striking. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:34, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment - When I first looked at the image, before reading Cart's description, my first thought was of Raiders of the Lost Ark warehouse. Smiled when I read "emulating the style of a specific movie". While the style is not the same, the feeling is. - ERcheck (talk) 03:33, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- That classic scene is hard not to have somewhere in the back of your head when you're editing a photo of a warehouse. :-) --Cart (talk) 03:37, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Btw, I was "going to the mattresses" down right in the photo. Extra points if you get that movie reference. --Cart (talk) 03:44, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Btw, I was "going to the mattresses" down right in the photo. Extra points if you get that movie reference. --Cart (talk) 03:44, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- That classic scene is hard not to have somewhere in the back of your head when you're editing a photo of a warehouse. :-) --Cart (talk) 03:37, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Movie references (spoiler) |
---|
:My first thought was You've Got Mail (I can hear Meg Ryan's voice), which of course was referring to The Godfather.- ERcheck (talk) 05:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC) — That earns you one point for the quote film, another one for the film quoting the quote, and finally one point for answering this in a stylish way. --Cart (talk) 12:11, 8 June 2025 (UTC) |
Support - For evoking immediate memories of classic films. Pushing the envelope. - ERcheck (talk) 13:34, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:42, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support. There's a hair of
chromatic aberration. Great photo! JayCubby (talk) 16:22, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Probably, but with all that extra color and light, I think that hair just adds to the flavor of this soup. ;) --Cart (talk) 16:25, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- I thought that it may have been left for a reason. JayCubby (talk) 02:55, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
- Probably, but with all that extra color and light, I think that hair just adds to the flavor of this soup. ;) --Cart (talk) 16:25, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:29, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2025 at 06:40:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 06:40, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Info Madonna on the crescent at the entrance of the Essener Cathedral Treasury, around 1500 Oak wood, polychrome. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:40, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 06:40, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 08:58, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support I like this one a lot better than the last one. The angle of the sculpture is a lot more flattering to it. Cmao20 (talk) 20:37, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:14, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- E.IMANCOMMONS 22:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:42, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:28, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2025 at 20:59:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Eclipse
Info created by KPNO/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/P. Horálek (Institute of Physics in Opava) – uploaded by Felipehernandez1193 – nominated by 3df -- 3df (talk) 20:59, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support I noticed that the eclipses section looked a little light on featured pictures, and I remember being blown away by this star trail (long exposure) picture of a total lunar eclipse behind an observatory. -- 3df (talk) 20:59, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
- Some of the eclipses are composites and montages, and are therefore kept in the Composites and Montages gallery. --Cart (talk) 21:08, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but the fisheye projection doesn't really work for me, it makes the effect look exaggerated and less interesting Cmao20 (talk) 23:27, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Long star trails and making a light trail out of an eclipse is an awesome idea, but adding a fisheye distortion to that is one Special Effects too much. Just because you have all these gadgets, doesn't mean you need to use them all at once; that makes for messy photos. --Cart (talk) 12:33, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Optical engineers spend their careers making lenses with minimal distortion, and the Institute just... adds distortion? JayCubby (talk) 01:09, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Lenguado común (Solea solea), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2023-07-27, DD 28.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2025 at 19:41:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Soleidae (True Soles)
Info created and uploaded by Poco a poco, nominated by Yann
Info Common sole (Solea solea), Arrábida National Park, Portugal. It lives on the sandy or muddy seabed of the northern Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea where it often partially immerses itself in the substrate. The small eyes are close to each other on the right side of the body. This gives the fish the possibility of lurking half-buried in the sand for passing prey. The common sole, just like all other flatfishes, hatches as an "ordinary" fish with one eye on each side of the body. The young metamorphose to flatfish begins when they are about one centimeter long. It grows to a maximum length of about 70 centimetres (28 in).
Support Another great Poco's image. -- Yann (talk) 19:41, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the nom, Yann! I do like it, indeed :) Poco a poco (talk) 19:46, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice photo. But I will note that we have two FPs of this species. I think this one is sufficiently different that it can be FP, but I think reviewers shouldb be aware of the others Cmao20 (talk)
- Yes. I think this one is more interesting, as it shows the whole fish, not only the head. And in the other one, the fish is buried in the sand. Yann (talk) 09:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:10, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Acroterion (talk) 14:39, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:37, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:43, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2025 at 14:25:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info created by Gzen92 – uploaded by Gzen92 – nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 14:25, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 14:25, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Satisfying and rewarding composition. I'll admit that the level of detail at full size is not quite where I'd want it to be but I can forgive it for a 24 megapixel file when it's composed so nicely. Cmao20 (talk) 23:24, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support nice motif and composition. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:42, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Regretful oppose Sorry, composition and motif are great, that is a very impressing wisteria, but the Dark ContoursTM that so many phones produce are not FP quality for me. I know that more and more voters are beginning to accept these quirks that phones have, probably worn down by seeing them so often and referring to big files, but for me they are not advancing the quality in photos. --Cart (talk) 12:04, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- You're right, unfortunately I didn't have my camera that day. Gzen92 (talk) 19:35, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Weak
Oppose as this is a good image. Just not the best lighting (a little too dark) and per Cart, not enough wow for me. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:42, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:37, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2025 at 11:13:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Fagales#Family : Fagaceae
Info created by StVeit Maps – uploaded by StVeit Maps – nominated by StVeit Maps -- StVeit Maps (talk) 11:13, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- StVeit Maps (talk) 11:13, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose The quality is very good, the framing is perfect, the back-light is making the leaves beautiful, there is a path I want to walk on - I would like to have it as a large print on my wall, just to dream... And then the whole thing is ruined by a big sign with a QR code. Sorry, --Cart (talk) 13:30, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support per everything Cart said - except the thing about the sign. I believe in pictures that show reality as it is. And most such spots nowadays have some kind of signage. Also this is very fitting for a picture in an encyclopedic porject. --Kritzolina (talk) 17:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Due to the CA in the leaves and the blown out highlights as well as the sign and the cable car wires, this is not a FP for me. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 19:14, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support The QR code on the sign doesn't bother me at all. It just is what it is. If anything I quite like that someone in some conservation department put up a sign so that curious people can find out more about their surroundings. The composition is lovely and so is the light. A flaw is that the highlights have been lowered too much in an attempt to recover detail that isn't there, meaning that what ought to be bright white is a dull grey. Cmao20 (talk) 23:23, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice scene at small size, but not unusual, and lacking in detail due to harsh lighting. --Tagooty (talk) 10:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20 --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:48, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Weak support It would be nice to remove CA. I like the light and the place. --Rbrechko (talk) 15:03, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Tagooty. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:37, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support: sign could be removed, but I don't see much wrong with having it around. JayCubby (talk) 16:28, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2025 at 10:20:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1960-1969
Info created by Walt Cisco, uploaded by JayCubby, nominated by Yann
Support Historical image with high value, good quality, high resolution. -- Yann (talk) 10:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support. Thanks for the nomination. JayCubby (talk) 11:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support as per nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:27, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Obviously. --Cart (talk) 13:34, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 14:06, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support - ERcheck (talk) 20:32, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Always makes me sad Cmao20 (talk) 23:21, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:47, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Felino Volador (talk) 21:27, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- E.IMANCOMMONS 22:25, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Goes without saying. – Aristeas (talk) 10:06, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2025 at 21:46:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info Shrimp and crayfish boat LL-25 MiTina turning into her home harbor in Norra Grundsund, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden.
- Standing on the jetty taking photos, I noticed the boat was approaching the harbor a bit faster than I thought it might, also taking the turn into the harbor a bit sharper than it should throwing up a good bow wave and backwash. After it had moored I jokingly commented on this to the captain. He said that he saw me on the jetty with my camera and was showing off to give me a good photo. :) After editing the photo, I sent a copy of it to the boat's internet page and gave them the rights to use it as they pleased. I figured, "one good turn deserves another". They still use this photo on social media and other things. :) All by me, -- Cart (talk) 21:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cart (talk) 21:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Very dynamic. Nice. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:13, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice action shot. —Bruce1eetalk 07:21, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:02, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:24, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Frank; and I like the pastel-colored sky. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:35, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support: follows rule of thirds, the horizon is straight, and the dynamic range is excellent. JayCubby (talk) 12:55, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Kudos to the captain and you --Kritzolina (talk) 17:58, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Dynamic composition, good quality, likeable captain. – Aristeas (talk) 19:21, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas and JayCubby. Clear FP Cmao20 (talk) 23:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Nice photo with high quality but the composition does not convince me completey. Looking at the driving direction of the ship it should be placed much more to the right (at 2/3 from the left and not at 1/3 as you've choosen - for me it looks a bit unbalanced. Otherwise the color contrast between ship/water to the rock in the background is nice and also the traces on the water. Thus: too good to oppose :) --Tuxyso (talk) 06:59, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Using Lead room is what we usually do/need for photos of vehicles, but that doesn't apply for action shots of moving objects where we have something behind whatever is moving to indicate speed and direction. It's the same for boats, ships, airplanes, rockets or tractors. Take a look at a mockup of this MiTina photo, and how it would look with your 2/3 placing. The boat still looks nice, but it slows the boat down considerably and cuts off the interesting backwash and trail in the sea. It's a good shot of a boat, but not an action shot. To indicate speed in a photo, we like to see the mess left behind the vehicle as it appears to burst out from the frame. --Cart (talk) 11:35, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Nicely done. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 19:06, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2025 at 12:59:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
Info Looking eastward at Dhavani village in the warm evening light. Located in the Nilgiri mountains of South India. Note: There are no FPs of settlements in India south of the Himalayas. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 12:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 12:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support The cluster of village buildings pops out of the exapnse of fields of varying shades of green. The evening colours in the sky elevate the image. —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:16, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support and I hope no one complains about the noise - this is a 41 megapixel image under low light conditions and we should be grateful to the nominator for uploading in full size rather than complaining about a bit of noise and adding noise reduction to ruin all the nice details. Cmao20 (talk) 23:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Quality does not convince me. If the light conditions are not good enough for a hand-held shot, just take a tripod. The photo also has remarkable border unsharpness - extermely visible at the left side. Regarding noise: Even if it's a 41 MP photo, that doesn't stop anyone from applying a proper noise reduction technique to a RAW image - for example the AI-based NR in Lightroom. All in all: For me not enough effort is done here to make the photo an FP. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:06, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Done @Tuxyso: I have applied NR to the sky and the distant hills on the left. Also, cropped a small strip on the left to remove the unsharp tree etc. Hope this is better. --Tagooty (talk) 10:06, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your effort, Tagooty. The noise on the sky is now much better managed. But for the noise level on the detail areas is (the trees, the buildings) is still too high. If you have the possibility I suggest to give the very good AI-based NR-technique of LR a try. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:56, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I'm sorry, while it is a good documentary photo and a worthy VI, it doesn't give me that wow-feeling I expect from an FP. The best thing this photo has going for it is the display of the Belt of Venus and now with the cut, some of that is gone. The general light is flat and makes the buildings look glary. As is often with a subject divided into two parts, leaving a void in the middle, I think it would have been better to make the framing around the left part of the village and the pink glow in the background. Take in too much and you often lose the image. (crop suggestion for an 'Alt'? It's big enough for this.) --Cart (talk) 12:49, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:36, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2025 at 12:22:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Canada
Info all by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:22, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:22, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Maybe a bit low wow, but pretty and nicely photographed Cmao20 (talk) 23:18, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2025 at 01:11:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Ornaments
Info Terra cotta sculptures at the entrance to the Brooklyn Historical Society building, New York City - created by Acroterion – uploaded by Acroterion – nominated by Acroterion -- Acroterion (talk) 01:11, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Acroterion (talk) 01:11, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Cool, do you know if the sculpture is supposed to be anyone in particular? Cmao20 (talk) 01:15, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- According to this [3] the sculptures at the doorway are just idealized figures - the one on the other side is a Viking (!). Other terra cotta sculptures on the building were of historical figures. All of them were executed by Olin Levi Warner in 1881. I'll add some of that to the description. Acroterion (talk) 01:33, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good focus on a detail of the façade that most people just overlook otherwise. --Cart (talk) 11:34, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 17:20, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Well done. I can't figure out why, but the picture instantly catches the eye. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:03, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:12, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:58, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:26, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Ekaterina. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:30, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cart & Екатерина Борисова. -- Terragio67 (talk) 18:34, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cart and Екатерина Борисова. – Aristeas (talk) 19:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Felino Volador (talk) 21:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Borracho mono (Ophioblennius steindachneri), Cabo San Lucas, Baja California, México, 2024-12-18, DD 80.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2025 at 19:33:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Blenniidae (Combtooth Blennies)
Info Large-banded blenny (Ophioblennius steindachneri), Cabo San Lucas, Baja California, Mexico. It's found in coral reefs in the eastern Pacific ocean. This species reaches a length of 18 centimetres (7.1 in). They are territorial and feed during the day when they graze on algae and prey on sessile invertebrates by using the incisor teeth, which are similar in shape to combs, to scrape food off the rock. Note: we have no FPs of this species and only one of the genus Ophioblennius. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:33, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:33, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Osmo Lundell hey 23:01, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent composition and sharpness, good separation from the background Cmao20 (talk) 00:38, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 11:36, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:23, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Good composition and detail in this underwater image. --Tagooty (talk) 13:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:56, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20 & Tagooty. – Terragio67 (talk) 10:23, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:27, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:20, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2025 at 15:43:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:43, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:43, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment - Trees on the side are distracting. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Sorry, pretty waterfall but not an outstanding composition for me Cmao20 (talk) 23:18, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Maybe I would prefer to use another crop, but anyway nice picture. --Rbrechko (talk) 14:56, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 18:17, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2025 at 15:41:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:41, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:41, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment This is a very nice little waterfall. However, I think you shouldn't be afraid to keep some of the shadows and black hues in the image. In this I've made a few tweaks to the exposure, reduced saturation and luminosity a bit, deepening some shadows, adjusted white balance a couple of clicks and tweaked the highlights. For me that gives the photo a more "3D look". Use it if you like or take some pointers from it. Best, --Cart (talk) 14:09, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment A nice waterfall and I appreciate that you used a realistic exposure time and not the omnipresent very long “waterfall exposure”. IMHO Cart’s version looks more realistic and up to life, therefore I would recommend to give it a try … – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 23:20:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1950-1959
Info restored and uploaded by JayCubby – nominated by JayCubby -- JayCubby (talk) 23:20, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Not the highest resolution (at 2500 px square), but an emotionally charged photograph -- JayCubby (talk) 23:20, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you Cart for the gallery fix. JayCubby (talk) 23:51, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- @ERcheck, though you removed your !vote, you still provided valuable feedback. Perhaps File:Emmett Till's funeral - mourners (restored) (test crop).jpg would be a better composition. JayCubby (talk) 03:50, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Though images may be cropped for articles, we usually prefer to feature historical photos uncropped as they are, only cropping away borders if they are not part of the presentation of the photo. --Cart (talk) 05:31, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Cart - I understand, and, in principle, agree with the reasons for leaving an historical photo uncropped. - ERcheck (talk) 05:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- I think the crop with the head cloned out would be better. Yann (talk) 17:39, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Yann,
Done, still at File:Emmett Till's funeral - mourners (restored) (test crop).jpg. JayCubby (talk) 20:17, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- @JayCubby - That crop works well. - ERcheck (talk) 21:23, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Yann,
- Though images may be cropped for articles, we usually prefer to feature historical photos uncropped as they are, only cropping away borders if they are not part of the presentation of the photo. --Cart (talk) 05:31, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- @JayCubby - I did remove my vote as I ponder this a bit more. I experimented with cropping the photo and found it to be much more evocative, though found it difficult to get it "just right". I tried the crop on the left to just enough to remove nearest gentleman's face, leaving the full expression of the other man; and, a crop from the right to remove the sliver of the person next to the woman with her arm raised. But, per Cart, I'm wary of advocating for that change. - ERcheck (talk) 05:39, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:16, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 05:44, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Been thinking about this for a long time now, and it is a very moving photo of very good quality taken at what must have been a rather chaotic event. It's a document of an historic event that I think should be preserved and featured in its entirety, after that people can use it as a base for other crops. Sure, we featured Heroico instead of the original, but that was mostly because the cropped version is the best one known and mostly used. I don't see any similar precedence with this. --Cart (talk) 12:03, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment - The above version is itself cropped. On EmmettTillExhibit.org, which was created in partnership with the Till family, The Emmett Till & Mamie Till-Mobley Institute, the Emmett Till Interpretive Center, and The Children's Museum of Indianapolis, see Image 16. In that "original" photo, Till's grandfather is also in the photo. As such, if one accepts a crop from the right, accepting a crop from the left (which is actually not taking out key people), would seem acceptable. - ERcheck (talk) 15:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Now the problem with that is that the full photo, probably from the original negative, is apparently owned some foundation or museum, so we are not sure that one is free to use and can probably not get our hands on it. The cropped photo above on the other hand, is from a paper copy owned by the Smithsonian and we know it is free. This is why so few old iconic photos get promoted. There are often many versions of them floating around and people here are forever quarrelling about which version to promote. (I can't remember how many attempts were made for different versions of Heroico for years.) I still say I vote to promote the whole photo we have and know is free, and let other crops be made from it, instead of mucking things up further. --Cart (talk) 17:04, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- I full-heartedly agree with Cart here! Kritzolina (talk) 17:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
- Now the problem with that is that the full photo, probably from the original negative, is apparently owned some foundation or museum, so we are not sure that one is free to use and can probably not get our hands on it. The cropped photo above on the other hand, is from a paper copy owned by the Smithsonian and we know it is free. This is why so few old iconic photos get promoted. There are often many versions of them floating around and people here are forever quarrelling about which version to promote. (I can't remember how many attempts were made for different versions of Heroico for years.) I still say I vote to promote the whole photo we have and know is free, and let other crops be made from it, instead of mucking things up further. --Cart (talk) 17:04, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
File:Mero chino (Cirrhitus rivulatus), Cabo San Lucas, Baja California, México, 2024-12-18, DD 01.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 20:45:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Cirrhitidae (Hawkfishes)
Info Portrait of a giant hawkfish (Cirrhitus rivulatus), Cabo San Lucas, Baja California, Mexico. This marine fish is found in the eastearn Pacific Ocean and is the largest of the hawkfish family with maximum size of 60 cm (24 in) in total length. Note: we have no FPs of the genus Cirrhitus. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Amazing capture! Cmao20 (talk) 23:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Exceptional clarity in the patterns --Tagooty (talk) 15:27, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:54, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:20, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:37, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:47, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:28, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 19:18:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
Info Small-scale lobster fishing boat Idunn in Björholmen fishing village on the Swedish island Tjörn. The boat is mostly used for Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) fishing. One of the few remaining fishing boats on the island which was once a significant center for fishing. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 19:18, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 19:18, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:12, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Good shot and nice detail but not an extraordinary subject / compo / lighting that would make it one of our finest shots Poco a poco (talk) 20:29, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:54, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2025 at 19:00:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Events
Info created and uploaded by Afsalgado – nominated by Kritzolina - another wonderful and really different find from WLF. This one is from a carnival in Portugal. -- Kritzolina (talk) 19:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Every time I look at this image I feel another jolt of positive surprise. The energy that is captured in this shot ist amazing. -- Kritzolina (talk) 19:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:16, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment Sorry, I'm not so keen on this, and after having had a look at the tasteful color photos from the same event, it feels like we are a bit short-changed by this B&W. Perhaps the author has a color version of this to upload? --Cart (talk) 22:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Cart, like you I also had a look at the other pictures in the category before nominating this one. But for me the resulting feeling was different - I felt reassured that the choice of B&W for this one was right. While the colors do well for most of the other motives (and yes, there are really good other shots in this category), this scene still works extremely well in B&W for me. I would like to hear opinions of others on this. Kritzolina (talk) 05:39, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Sure thing! I didn't cast a vote since I don't want to stand in the way for people who really like this B&W version, but I wanted to ask. --Cart (talk) 05:53, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Cart, like you I also had a look at the other pictures in the category before nominating this one. But for me the resulting feeling was different - I felt reassured that the choice of B&W for this one was right. While the colors do well for most of the other motives (and yes, there are really good other shots in this category), this scene still works extremely well in B&W for me. I would like to hear opinions of others on this. Kritzolina (talk) 05:39, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support I love it. IMHO black and white is great here because it gives the image a timeless and magical effect – could be a scene from some fantasy novel or Middle Ages movie. Works perfectly with the century-old stone walls and houses. One of my absolute favorites after browsing > 7000 images for the international WLF jury. – Aristeas (talk) 07:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Aristeas! Well, apart from browsing 7000+ WLF images, which I didn't do, kudos for the hard work :) --Julesvernex2 (talk) 18:50, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:53, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:36, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Support It's really special! -- Radomianin (talk) 09:33, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose black/white does not convince be for a photo showing carneval. At the first glance I though the photo is a scan from a 50 year old camera. Taking into consideration that a state-of-the-art camera (Fuji X-T5) was used here the quality is only average and does not reach the FP bar here. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:54, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2025 at 04:57:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Genus : Halcyon
Info created & uploaded by Amarchobiabhi – nominated by ROCKY -- ROCKY (talk) 04:57, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- ROCKY (talk) 04:57, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 09:20, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Superb action shot, lovely colours and composition, could be POTY. --Tagooty (talk) 11:24, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment I may risk being uncharitable here but I struggle to understand how this picture, which is almost completely lacking in detail at full size, gets rave reviews from you whereas my nomination gets an oppose vote for 'lack of detail'. Cmao20 (talk) 00:03, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support Kingfishers are great subjects. Acroterion (talk) 12:41, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- The comments below are valid criticisms, thank you for highlighting them. They should also be curable to enhance the image to FP expectations both technically and aesthetically. ROCKY, is it possible to induce the uploader to upload a less-aggressively-processed version? They appear to have been active in March. Acroterion (talk) 17:06, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose A beautiful and difficult shot, regrettably ruined by excessive sharpening and noise reduction --Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Sadly, I have to agree with Julesvernex2. It's unfortunate that excessive sharpening and denoising have resulted in a washed-out and overly uniform look – many details appear lost. With more careful post-processing, especially when using AI-based tools, significantly better results are possible. Perhaps the nominator could kindly ask the author via e-mail whether a new development from the Raw file might be feasible? Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 15:14, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose per Jules and Radomianin, so sorry. It always makes me sad when I see that people have great skills and make every effort to achieve wonderful photos, but then damage these images by rash post-processing so that they look like smartphone shots. This is such a stunning photo, it has deserved much better post-processing. Nerd hint: the pattern in some of the OOF drops of water at the top may be caused by the Phase Fresnel (PF) lens element; this is an additional reason why this photo needs careful editing – one should not emphasize that pattern by sharpening.– Aristeas (talk) 16:26, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Ah, good point! This review warns about the risk of getting "Fresnel bokeh" on specular highlights, indeed one more reason to be careful when editing this image Julesvernex2 (talk) 10:02, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Julesvernex2 is right, great capture but very poor quality and overprocessed at full size Cmao20 (talk) 23:58, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2025 at 05:50:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Kritzolina. When I recently visited Prague, I was fascinated by the structures the motion of this sculpture created, especially the colored reflections on its moving pieces in front of the background of utalitarian office buildings. I took several shots of it, this one captures best what I really like about this artwork. -- Kritzolina (talk) 05:50, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kritzolina (talk) 05:50, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Very beautiful and carefully composed. Cmao20 (talk) 11:01, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I find the sculpture of the head pretty coold and FP-worthy but this picture is cluttered. I recognize no head here. Poco a poco (talk) 11:31, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice close-up of this kinetic (as in constantly moving) sculpture. For those who have not read Kafka, this transforming work is a nod to his most famous book, The Metamorphosis, where one morning, ordinary salesman Gregor Samsa wakes up to find himself transformed into a giant cockroach. No normal human head needs to be visible, Kafka was a pretty warped guy. --Cart (talk) 12:24, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Don't forget that Kafka was also a pretty funny guy and we know that he laughed at his own writings [4]. I really like that about him. Kritzolina (talk) 05:59, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Support The photo artfully captures the abstract quality of the sculpture. The dynamic movement and vibrant color reflections contrast vividly with the adjacent facade. The result is an eye-catching interplay between the kinetic sculpture detail and the urban architecture. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:44, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Most unusual. Photographing shiny objects is difficult, and it is well done here. Yann (talk) 16:06, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Support The photos perfectly shows how the complex surface of the sculpture reflects and distorts the reality around in countless facets; just like Kafka’s work, while it may appear fantastic at the first glance, reflects the countless facets of human society. – Aristeas (talk) 18:53, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 09:20, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:14, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 11:18, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 12:13, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Support–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:00, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
タイムテーブル (推薦から5日後)
[edit]Wed 04 Jun → Mon 09 Jun Thu 05 Jun → Tue 10 Jun Fri 06 Jun → Wed 11 Jun Sat 07 Jun → Thu 12 Jun Sun 08 Jun → Fri 13 Jun Mon 09 Jun → Sat 14 Jun
タイムテーブル (推薦から10日後)
[edit]Fri 30 May → Mon 09 Jun Sat 31 May → Tue 10 Jun Sun 01 Jun → Wed 11 Jun Mon 02 Jun → Thu 12 Jun Tue 03 Jun → Fri 13 Jun Wed 04 Jun → Sat 14 Jun Thu 05 Jun → Sun 15 Jun Fri 06 Jun → Mon 16 Jun Sat 07 Jun → Tue 17 Jun Sun 08 Jun → Wed 18 Jun Mon 09 Jun → Thu 19 Jun