Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Dean Franklin - 06.04.03 Mount Rushmore Monument (by-sa).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 17:34:09

Info The image quality is significantly worse than existing FP File:Mount Rushmore detail view.jpg. It is only a tenth of the resolution in each dimension not to mention worse dynamic range and detail. (Original nomination)
Delist -- dllu (t,c) 17:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This wouldn't be promoted now, after someone has uploaded a 600 megapixel behemoth view of the same subject, but on its own it doesn't fall short enough of FPC standards to need delisting. It's not like this is is VIC, where there can only be one image per subject. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the original nominator. ★ 21:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Even though the pictures portraits the same subject almost from the same placement, light and colors are slightly different. I agree with to others to keep both as FP, too. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Rhododendrites and Harlock81. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mile (talk) 11:55, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 delist, 5 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]