User talk:kallerna
|
Archive: |
|---|
Hello, welcome to my talk page!
- Please don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~.
- If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page–my talk page–as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place.
- If I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lido di Jesolo Pier 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 3 Zinnen Dolomites ski resort 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, A.Savin 08:42, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lido di Jesolo 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Venice Ponte dell'Accademia Grand Canal santa Maria della Salute 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bridge of Sighs sea facade night 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lido di Jesolo 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lido di Jesolo 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jesolo ferris wheel Pala Arrex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Venezia - Empoli Serie A 04012025 Stadio Pier Luigi Penzo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Venezia - Empoli Serie A 04012025 Stadio Pier Luigi Penzo 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Torri di Piazza Drago Jesolo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jesolo Città del Natale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Venezia - Empoli Serie A 04012025 Stadio Pier Luigi Penzo 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard. Maybe you want read it. Greetins. 78.208.14.17 10:14, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. I do not want to participate in the conversation, as it could be interpreted as a "revenge". —kallerna (talk) 10:41, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Millennium Cross Cableway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vodno snow 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Millennium Cross Vodno 2025 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Millennium Cross Vodno 2025 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Millennium Cross Vodno 2025 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bansko ski 2025 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! ASNOM Delčevo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bansko ski 2025 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Millennium Cross Vodno 2025 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bansko ski 2025 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bregalnica Delčevo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bansko ski 2025 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bansko ski 2025 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vodno Telecommunication Tower 2025 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bansko ski 2025 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Anteni Sin Vrv 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panorama Krasta 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Krasta Jakupica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kitka Jakupica range 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grand Canal Ponte degli Scalzi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Popova Šapka ski center 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Popova Šapka ski center 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Anteni Sin Vrv 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Popova Šapka ski center 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rozafa Fortress 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.svg/20px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png){kind=small}
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rozafa Fortress 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rozafa Fortress 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rozafa Fortress 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Duhël M25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bansko ski 2025 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bansko ski 2025 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rozafa Fortress 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rozafa Fortress 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dubrovnik Old Town 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bay of Kotor 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pelješac Bridge 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pelješac Bridge 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pelješac Bridge 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bay of Kotor 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Skradinski buk Krka National Park 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Skradinski buk Krka National Park 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Skradinski buk Krka National Park 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rozafa Fortress 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Skradinski buk Krka National Park 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Skradinski buk Krka National Park 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 45a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monte Civetta Caprile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada-Arabba-Val di Fassa 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada-Arabba-Val di Fassa 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada-Arabba-Val di Fassa 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada-Arabba-Val di Fassa 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada from Porta Vescovo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marmolada-Arabba-Val di Fassa 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit] |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 45a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Marmolada + Sellaronda tour 45a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Menettely käyttäjän ollessa kuollut
[edit]Hei kallerna. Miten toimitaan, jos käyttäjä on kuollut? ”Wikipedia protects their userpages to prevent vandalism, and preserves them in their memory.” (en:Category:Deceased Wikipedians) Käyttäjä Tvkosone ilmoittaa suomenkielisen Wikipedian käyttäjäsivullaan ”Tatu Kosonen, Ylämaa” (katso myös historia). Hän on muokannut artikkelia Tatu Kosonen, jossa on lähteistetty hänen kuolleen 22. huhtikuuta 2022. Naukkarinen, Petri (2022-04-24). In memoriam – Tatu Kosonen. Kamiza. Archived from the original on 2025-01-24.
- Commons Tvkosone (talk · contribs)
- suomenkielinen Wikipedia Tvkosone (talk · contribs)
- CentralAuth/Tvkosone
raid5 21:43, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Enpä tiedä tarvitseeko tehdä mitään. Laitoin nyt kuitenkin ikuisen suojauksen käyttäjäsivulle ja keskustelusivun alkuun bannerin ettei oleteta vastausta. Rauha hänelle siis. —kallerna (talk) 05:41, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Kiitos, teit riittävästi. Kuvien ongelmamerkinnöissä menee automaattisesti ilmoitus lataajalle. Bannerista taas näkee, ettei ei kannata vuosien takaisia muokkauksia kysellä. En tuntenut käyttäjää, mutta hänkin harrasti judoa ja kirjoitin pari kommenttia hänen keskustelusivulleen suomenkielisessä Wikipediassa. Lisäsin keskustelusivulle luokan Deceased Commons users. raid5 18:53, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit] |
The image File:Vodno Telecommunication Tower.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vodno Telecommunication Tower.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nervión river Puente de la Salve Bilbao 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Derio station Bilbao 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puppy Jeff Koons.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Guggenheim Museum Bilbao 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Guggenheim Museum Bilbao 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zubizuri bridge Bilbao.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nervión River Bilbao 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Uribarri station Bilbao metro 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puente Pedro Arrupe 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nervión River Bilbao 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Finnish help needed
[edit]Hi, Hope you can help, if only just to say "no source listed". I came across Kakekoski (talk · contribs) who uploaded scanned photos dated 1959 as "own work" without a source. I found a source that includes a few of them PDF file here but I can't read it well enough to figure if they mention a photographer or other source. The images look to be newspaper scans, and I'm not sure where to look. Thanks for any help you can give -- Deadstar (msg) 09:32, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi! The source mentions the photographers of only two photographs: the ones on page 291 (V-K Ahola). The uploaded images seem to be just mobile phone photocopies from old newspapers - quite low quality. Definitely the source is not "Kakekoski". However, most probably these old imgs could be uploaded to Commons (if source found), maybe with better quality from the pdf you linked. —kallerna (talk) 13:15, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help! -- Deadstar (msg) 13:38, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! MS Finnmaid 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! MS Finnlady 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hamburg view St. Nikolai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Croda Cuz 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blindsee Zugspitze 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! MS Finnmaid 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Luokittelukysymys: People of Finland by occupation
[edit]Hei kallerna. Olisitko tiennyt miten luokitellaan suomalaisten ammateissa? People of Finland by occupation sisältää alaluokan Literary historians, joka on myös tieteilijäluokkien kautta alaluokkana (People of Finland by occupation ↳ Scientists from Finland ↳ Scientists from Finland by field ↳ Social scientists from Finland ↳ Historians from Finland ↳ Literary historians from Finland ↵ People of Finland by occupation). Kumosin muokkaukseni. Vastaava luokka on esimerkiksi Mathematicians from Finland. raid5 14:13, 25 May 2025 (UTC) edit typo cat. raid5 21:46, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Moi! Laittaisin pelkän yläluokan (Scientists from Finland) tuohon yleisluokkaan (People of Finland by occupation). Kuitenkin, toi yleisluokka on melkoinen sillisalaatti, ettei se nyt suuri virhe ole. —kallerna (talk) 06:11, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Vielä - siinä olisi homma jollekin niputtaa noita yhteen ja poistaa "alaluokat" yleisluokasta. Eihän ole tarkoituksenmukaista että yleisluokassa on noin suuri määrä alakategorioita. Mutta Commonsissa on paljon muokkaajia, ja vähän niitä ketkä korjaavat toisten virheitä. Ei ole poikkeuksellista löytää rinnakkaisia luokkia jne. Vapautta muokata rohkeasti saa käyttää enemmän :) —kallerna (talk)
- Kiitos vastauksesta. Joudun välillä katsomaan mallia esimerkiksi muiden maiden luokista, tosin niissäkin saattaa olla yliluokittelua tai rakennetta on aluksi hankala hahmottaa. Lopulta joudun kysymään neuvoa. Teen virheitä, mutta pyrin korjaamaan sotkuni. raid5 21:40, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Luokassa Scientists from Finland on luokka Computer scientists from Finland. Jostakin syystä Scientists from Finland by field luokitellaan mallineella {{Topic from country}} eri tavalla, atk-tieteilijät eivät ole kuten arkeologit, muissa maissa on vastaavasti. En muuta sen luokitusta. Matemaatikoissa on myös mallineella luokittelu. raid5 22:04, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Olet oikeassa, nuo mallineen luomat luokat ovat osaltaan luoneet ongelmaa. —kallerna (talk) 06:39, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Poistin mallineen, se ratkaisi luokitteluongelman yhdessä kohtaa. En kuitenkaan osaa korjata mallinetta, poistan mallineen ainoastaan suomalaisten ammatteihin liittyvistä luokista. raid5 14:06, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Olet oikeassa, nuo mallineen luomat luokat ovat osaltaan luoneet ongelmaa. —kallerna (talk) 06:39, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Giro d'Italia 2025, Stage 13 Passo Roverello 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Giro d'Italia 2025, Stage 13 Passo Roverello 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salles-la-Source May 2025 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Skopje Kisela Voda view 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salles-la-Source May 2025 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Belcastel 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Viaduc de la Gascarie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Giro d'Italia 2025, Stage 14 Treviso 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parco Regionale dei Colli Euganei panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parco Regionale dei Colli Euganei 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salles-la-Source May 2025 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salles-la-Source May 2025 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Castello di Roncade 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Belcastel 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Viaduct over D901 near Salles-la-Source 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Belcastel 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salles-la-Source May 2025 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pcinja Katlanovo 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Istanbul airport Terminal entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Viaduc de la Gascarie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Warrior on Horseback Skopje 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rodez view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! L'Aveyron D624.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Passo dello Stelvio Bormio side 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salles-la-Source May 2025 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Giro d'Italia 2025, Stage 14 Treviso 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trail Vodno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Viaduc de la Gascarie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Kysymys luokkien erikielisistä kuvauksista
[edit]Hei kallerna. Commonsin kahvikeskustelut tai toimintavat eivät ole minulle tuttuja. Tiedätkö, onko jossakin kerrottu mitä luokkien sivuilla ei saa olla yhdenmukaisuuden takia? Voiko luokissa käyttää erikielisiä kuvauksia (kielikoodit → −kielikoodit, +translation table → −translation table)? Jos alkaisin ”siivoamaan” bottimaisesti kategorioita (esimerkiksi Presidents of Finland, Pages that link to "Template:Translation table") tai palauttamaan omia muokkauksiani, niin luultavasti joku puuttuisi toimintaani. Suomenkielisessä Wikipediassa on usein ”milloin mitenkin” -periaate, johon minun on hieman hankala tottua. raid5 15:49, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hmm, kieltämättä erikoinen juttu, lieneekö idea sitten että tekstit löytyvät metasta tms. Kannattaa kysyä järkeilyä ehkä suoraan käyttäjältä joka palautti muutokset. —kallerna (talk) 07:05, 9 June 2025 (UTC)